What is the actual differences between the nano clearomizer and CE3

[otiose]

Both Nano Clearomizer and CE3 looks kinda the same, ie, a base on the bottom with a tower all the way to the top. Basically a bottom coil cartomizer in a pre-built tank with the Nano Clearomizer top filling and the CE3 top upside down filling.

I have use a few of these and my verdict is that CE3 has much better taste, hit and vapor although its heats up more and the juice finishing faster (the Nano Clearomizer have bad air flow draw). The caveat is that you need to setup the CE3 properly and when it works, good stuff on a std battery.

My question to all the sifu and expert is: why is the actual difference inside ? ie, the engine so to speak that makes it difference ?

 

[Garemlin]

I can't say what the difference is but I will say this. I don't like either. The CE3 were great while they worked. But all of mine developed leaks after a few uses. And I followed the filling instructions to the letter. The Nano I hated. No flavor and very little vapor. Glad I only ordered one. I like the concept of bottom coils but to me top coils give better flavor and vapor.

 

[otiose]

so what have u found to work with yr 808 batteries ?

 

[Garemlin]

so what have u found to work with yr 808 batteries ?

I like V2 Liquimax and e-smart clearos. The e-smarts are like 1.6ml.

Tap'd from my Maxx

 

[puffins]

I asked this question to smokeless and was told they are similar in design but the CE3 is a fully sealed system and the Nano is not. I do not know if the coils or other internal parts are any different.