What's better 510Lr or 306LR??
- Thread starter hubseven
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
I lean toward 306s but you do suffer a flavor loss more so than the 510s which I dont mind...that being said I have a bunch of both and all are Ciscos.
I'll tell you this much, I HATE dry vaping the primer off of a new atty... of course I blew out as much as I could, but man this stuff is straight up nasty. Is there any easier way to get the primer off?
Personally, I use 510's. Never tried a 306 so I cannot compare.
Personally, I use 510's. Never tried a 306 so I cannot compare.
Avid Vaper sells LR510 that with no primer liquid. Thats where I get mine.
My preference is 306LR 1.5ohms, but I have tried and liked the 510LR 1.5 too. My Grande loves the 306, as does the Mini; when you squonk the juice it goes into the reservoir first, so you can tell it has been pushed from the bottle. With a 510, it goes straight into the atty w/o appearing in the reservoir first. I don't know why this is, but that's what is happening on my 2 Reos.
My feelings are that the 510LR puts out more vapor, but the 306LR puts out better taste. Of course, YMMV.
My feelings are that the 510LR puts out more vapor, but the 306LR puts out better taste. Of course, YMMV.
I prefer the Cisco 1.5 ohm 306's on my Mini, but I use strong flavors. Also, since I throw the Mini in my purse, I find that the overflow well stays dry with the 306's, but juice will release more from the 510's.
I find that 510's can handle thick juice (100% VG) better than 306's, probably due to a wider inner area, therefore less likely to be prone to flooding.
I use the Ikenvape 510 2.0's on my Grand and like them very much. My friend uses the Ikenvape 2.0's but in 306 format on his Grand. We are both partial to our setups. I find that the 2.0's provide better flavour compared to the LR1.5's that I've tried before and that includes the Cisco 1.5's.
- Status
Similar threads
