We all know that banning e-cigs and juice because of trace amounts of chemicals is ridiculous. That would be like banning non-alcoholic beer because it had trace amounts of alcohol.
That's not Whats happing here.
The FDA will NOT ban e-cigs or juice. But they will require more testing to make shure its safe.
more testing = more money
more money =a tax on e-cigs and juice
Rember tobacco is one of the most heavely taxed goods you can buy. And e-cigs are a un-taped and un-TAXED market.
If the goverment could lay a 50% tax on e-juice right now,(about $10 per 30ml) the FDA would pull a groin muscle getting it aproved as quickly as possable.
And THATS WHAT THE BAN IS REALY ABOUT.
The FDA threatends a ban, and then agrees to keep the product on the market during testing.
Then taxes the product to pay for the testing.
And then approves the product along with the taxes to pay for further testing.
The FDA'sban has nothing to do with the health and safty of consumers.
It has everything to do with generating taxes $$ to study and monator a possable health problem that was never realy there.
That's not Whats happing here.
The FDA will NOT ban e-cigs or juice. But they will require more testing to make shure its safe.
more testing = more money
more money =a tax on e-cigs and juice
Rember tobacco is one of the most heavely taxed goods you can buy. And e-cigs are a un-taped and un-TAXED market.
If the goverment could lay a 50% tax on e-juice right now,(about $10 per 30ml) the FDA would pull a groin muscle getting it aproved as quickly as possable.
And THATS WHAT THE BAN IS REALY ABOUT.
The FDA threatends a ban, and then agrees to keep the product on the market during testing.Then taxes the product to pay for the testing.And then approves the product along with the taxes to pay for further testing.The FDA'sban has nothing to do with the health and safty of consumers.
It has everything to do with generating taxes $$ to study and monator a possable health problem that was never realy there.
LOL.
