Public Health England's endorsement of vaping is International "game changer"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
Public Health England commissions lengthy report: “E-cigarettes, and evidence update” that objectively assesses the scientific evidence on vapor products (in sharp contrast to fear mongering lies and bans pushed by Obama’s DHHS, Big Pharma shills, JAMA, etc.)
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploa...ort_commissioned_by_Public_Health_England.pdf

Public Health England report “E-cigarettes: a new foundation for evidence-based policy and practice” documents the health benefits of vaping in England, recommends new policies and practices to encourage more smokers to switch to vaping
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploa...on_for_evidence_based_policy_and_practice.pdf

excerpt

Safety and the perception of risks

It is important that the public be provided with balanced information on the risks of ecigarettes, so that smokers understand the potential benefits of switching and so non-smokers understand the risks that taking up e-cigarettes might entail:

 when used as intended, e-cigarettes pose no risk of nicotine poisoning to users, but e-liquids should be in ‘childproof’ packaging. The accuracy of nicotine content labelling currently raises no major concerns

 the conclusion of Professor John Britton’s 2014 review for PHE, that while vaping may not be 100% safe, most of the chemicals causing smoking-related disease are absent and the chemicals present pose limited danger, remains valid. The current best estimate is that e-cigarette use is around 95% less harmful to health than smoking

 e-cigarettes release negligible levels of nicotine into ambient air with no identified health risks to bystanders

 over the last year, there has been an overall shift among adults and youth towards the inaccurate perception of e-cigarettes as at least as harmful as cigarettes


Implications of the evidence for policy and practice
Based on the findings of the evidence review PHE also advises that:

 e-cigarettes have the potential to help smokers quit smoking, and the evidence indicates they carry a fraction of the risk of smoking cigarettes but are not risk free

 e-cigarettes potentially offer a wide reach, low-cost intervention to reduce smoking in more deprived groups in society where smoking is elevated, and we want to see this potential fully realised

 there is an opportunity for e-cigarettes to help tackle the high smoking rates among people with mental health problems, particularly in the context of creating smokefree mental health units  the potential of e-cigarettes to help improve public health depends on the extent to which they can act as a route out of smoking for the country’s eight million tobacco users, without providing a route into smoking for children and non-smokers. Appropriate and proportionate regulation is essential if this goal is to be achieved E-cigarettes: a new foundation for evidence-based policy and practice

 local stop smoking services provide smokers with the best chance of quitting successfully and we want to see them engaging actively with smokers who want to quit with the help of e-cigarettes

 we want to see all health and social care professionals providing accurate advice on the relative risks of smoking and e-cigarette use, and providing effective referral routes into stop smoking services

 the best thing smokers can do for their health is to quit smoking completely and to quit for good. PHE is committed to ensure that smokers have a range of evidence-based, effective tools to help them to quit. We encourage smokers who want to use e-cigarettes as an aid to quit smoking to seek the support of local stop smoking services

 given the potential benefits as quitting aids, PHE looks forward to the arrival on the market of a choice of medicinally regulated products that can be made available to smokers by the NHS on prescription. This will provide assurance on the safety, quality and effectiveness to consumers who want to use these products as quitting aids

 the latest evidence will be considered in the development of the next Tobacco Control Plan for England with a view to maximising the potential of e-cigarettes as a route out of smoking and minimising the risk of their acting as a route into smoking



Public Health England says “E-cigarettes are 95% less harmful to your health than normal cigarettes,” but provides no evidence e-cigs pose 5% of cigarette risks. Says “When supported by a smoking cessation service, they help most smokers to quit tobacco altogether,” but provides no evidence cessation services assist smokers switch to vaping.
E-cigarettes: an evidence update - Publications - GOV.UK

Also this week

ASH UK: Latest data finds no evidence that electronic cigarettes are a gateway to smoking for young people
http://www.ash.org.uk/media-room/pr...tes-are-a-gateway-to-smoking-for-young-people
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350615002693
Fears e-cigarettes lead children to smoke tobacco are unfounded, survey suggests - Health News - Health & Families - The Independent
E-cigarettes are NOT encouraging young people to smoke, Ash reveals | This is Money
E-cigarette use rising among British youths, campaign group study shows | Society | The Guardian
Young people are 'vaping' more and smoking less. We're still trying to work out why. | Irish Examiner

ASH UK fact sheet on the use of electronic cigarettes among children in Great Britain
http://ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_959.pdf
 
Last edited:

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
Commentaries on PHE’s endorsement of vaping

Clive Bates: Public Health England says truthful realistic things about e-cigarettes
Public Health England says truthful realistic things about e-cigarettes « The counterfactual

Matt Ridley: This absurd U-turn on e-cigarettes was so easily avoided
This absurd U-turn on e-cigarettes was so easily avoided | The Times

Talking Politics: Anti-vaping campaigners are a threat to public health
Anti-vaping campaigners are a threat to public health | Talking Politics - Yahoo News UK

News stories highlighting PHE’s endorsement of vaping (among >100 news stories)

Vaping: e-cigarettes safer than smoking, says Public Health England
Vaping: e-cigarettes safer than smoking, says Public Health England | Society | The Guardian

E-cigarettes could be prescribed by NHS to help smokers quit, report says
E-cigarettes could be prescribed by the NHS to help smokers quit, report says - BBC News

Make e-cigarettes available on the NHS say government health officials
Make e-cigarettes available on NHS, say Government health officials - Health News - Health & Families - The Independent

British smokers urged to start vaping by health officials
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/11810284/British-smokers-urged-to-start-vaping-by-health-officials.html

Expert review backs positive potential of e-cigarettes
Expert review backs positive potential of e-cigarettes | News | Nursing Times

Give e-cigarettes out for FREE on the NHS help smokers quit, say health chiefs: Devices are 95% safer than cigarettes and could save 76,000 lives every year
NHS should give out free e-cigarettes says Public Health England | Daily Mail Online

Study: E-cigarettes are 95% safer than tobacco
Study: E-cigarettes Are 95% Safer Than Tobacco | The Daily Caller

UK study endorses ‘game-changing’ e-cigarettes for first time
UK study endorses 'game-changing' e-cigarettes for first time | Reuters

E-cigarettes should be prescribed on NHS by doctors
E-cigarettes should be prescribed to smokers on NHS: study - Yahoo News

E-cigarettes 95% safer than tobacco, say UK health officials
E-cigarettes 95% safer than tobacco, say UK health officials

In Wales, E-cigarettes are treated like sticks of poison. In England they might available on the NHS. Figure that out.
In Wales, E-cigs are treated like sticks of poison. In England they might be available on the NHS. Figure that out. - David James - Wales Online

E-cigarette restrictions in Wales ‘not backed by evidence’
E-cigarette restrictions in Wales 'not backed by evidence' - BBC News

E-cigarettes: English health bosses want to prescribe them on the NHS. But what about Wales?
E-cigarettes: English health bosses want to prescribe them on the NHS. But what about Wales?
| Wales - ITV News


Cancer charity calls for Welsh Government U-turn on e-cigs
Cancer charity calls for Welsh Government U-turn on e-cigs | Wales - ITV News

UK plans to prescribe e-cigarettes to help smokers quit
UK plans to prescribe e-cigarettes to help smokers quit - The Times of India

E-cigarettes ‘should be prescribed’
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian

US News articles on PHE vaping reports and recommendations

E-cigarettes ‘Should be prescribed on the NHS to cut smoking-related deaths’
E-Cigarettes 'Should Be Prescribed On The NHS To Cut Smoking-Related Deaths'

E-cigs ‘should be prescribed’ to help smokers quit
E-cigarettes could be prescribed for some smokers in England after an independent review of the evidence

E-cigarettes ‘95% less harmful than tobacco’
E-cigarettes '95% less harmful than tobacco' - Medical News Today

E-cigarettes can help smokers quit, UK health agency says
E-Cigarettes Can Help Smokers Quit, U.K. Health Agency Says - WSJ

E-cigarettes 95% less harmful than tobacco, UK study says
E-cigarettes 95 percent less harmful than tobacco, UK study says | Fox News

Should doctors prescribe e-cigarettes?
Should doctors prescribe e-cigarettes? UK study says e-cigs are 95 percent less harmful than tobacco

British study says electronic cigarettes curb smoking risks
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/20/b...electronic-cigarettes-curb-smoking-risks.html

E-cigarettes are 95% less harmful than tobacco: UK study
E-cigarettes are 95 percent less harmful than tobacco: UK study| Reuters

E-cigarettes are 95% less harmful than cigarettes, UK report says (Godshall comments)
E-cigs 95 percent less harmful than cigarettes, UK report says | TheHill
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
Please note that although other ECF threads contain some of these documents and news articles, I created this thread about Public Health England's truly historic endorsement of vaping to better inform readers, organize the related documents, and assist with future ECF searches.
 

sofarsogood

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 12, 2014
5,553
14,168
Now it's enouogh to say, I agree with the British Health Service. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to defend ecigs. That should encourage more citizen vapers to get more politically active.

I've always been fond of the Brits. They've just given me another reason.
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
thanks Bill.
Did you know you created 5 or 6 posts with the same heading?
mike

Not until now. The first five times I tried to create the post, nothing happened (or at least I thought nothing happened, as it typically notifies me that a thread or post has occurred).

Can an admin please delete my duplicate thread posts, as I don't know how to do so.
 

Rednaxela1987

Super Member
Jul 15, 2015
667
1,559
37
Olympia, WA
This was exactly my first thought when I watched the time.com video about UK heath dept declaration on electronic cigarettes. A game changer. With the push to regulate and completely disrupt the business and community of vapers in US, I truly hope this release will help create more confidence in pro-e cig information, education and advocacy, confidence that there truly is substance to claims that vaping is an amazing new direction and opportunity for health and culture.

With even a minute possibility of a healthier alternative to combustible tobacco use, it's upsetting that so many people are so quick to assume it's "no better than" or "at least just as harmful as cigarette smoking".

I like the comparison of breathing in the smoke from a campfire to breathing the steam in a hot sauna. Which do you think is healthier??
 

sofarsogood

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 12, 2014
5,553
14,168
The two loudest groups in the EC wars are the people who have a lot to gain (vapers), and the people who have a lot to lose (tax supported institutions like medical research, education and local governments). It's been trench warefare for several years, verbal artillery duals where nobody gains or loses much ground. Until Public Health England weighed in the vapers had no respected institution to back them up. Now may be more vaper sympathizers, who hope we are right for the sake of public health, will speak out.

If the FDA chooses a course that leads to more smokers vaping I'll respect the decision even if it inconveniences me. If they do the reverse... I think the FDA understands that simple math.
 

sofarsogood

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 12, 2014
5,553
14,168
How would such a course inconvenience you? Am I reading this sentence wrong?
I don't want any new limitations or restrictions of any kind on my access to EC products. May be there is some way the government could interfere with the market and it grows the same or faster. I don't see how that could happen but may be there's something I've overlooked. It seems to me the best thing government could do about vaping is--nothing.
 

twgbonehead

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Apr 28, 2011
3,705
7,020
MA, USA
Bill,

Thank you! Thank you, thank you thank you, thank you!
You have done such an excellent job, both here on ECF, and in the political/public sphere, and I wanted to personally thank you for your efforts!

This post is different from many of your others, it gives me hope, perhaps the tide is turning?

What is going through my head is a Todd Rundgren song:

Somehow, Some Day
We need Just One Victory and we're on our way.
Work for it all day
Fight for it all night
We need Just One Victory And we'll be all right.

For the first time, I'm starting to feel that we might be all right.

Thanks!!!
 

DrMA

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 26, 2013
2,989
9,887
Seattle area
Last edited:

Katya

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
34,804
120,147
SoCal
The Lancet has taken a stand against PHE's study and conclusions. I think you have to register to view the article, but registration is free:

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)00042-2/fulltext

Well, that's not exactly unexpected. It was bound to be attacked.

The Lancet says:

"PHE claims that it protects and improves the nation's health and wellbeing. To do so, it needs to rely on the highest quality evidence. On this occasion, it has fallen short of its mission."

The Lancet, however, doesn't provide ANY evidence to the contrary, neither the lowest nor the highest quality. :facepalm: Just an opinion--based on nothing. But I guess that Lancet is held to different standards than PHE...

I'm getting so sick and tired of this BS.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread