you think that's bad? Check out the Daily Fail version
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3213676/E-cigarette-industry-funded-experts-ruled-vaping-safe-Official-advice-based-research-scientists-pay-vaping-companies.html
also see my post above for the expert reaction from David Nutt and PHE.
Not a question, and someday if I ever think of something I could make fun of you about, I just might. But I do want to look up the collection of available emoticons.
you think that's bad? Check out the Daily Fail version
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3213676/E-cigarette-industry-funded-experts-ruled-vaping-safe-Official-advice-based-research-scientists-pay-vaping-companies.html
Not a question, and someday if I ever think of something I could make fun of you about, I just might. But I do want to look up the collection of available emoticons.
you think that's bad? Check out the Daily Fail version
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3213676/E-cigarette-industry-funded-experts-ruled-vaping-safe-Official-advice-based-research-scientists-pay-vaping-companies.html
also see my post above for the expert reaction from David Nutt and PHE.
All real good articles, including the 2014 ASCH one criricizing a 2014 Lancet article. Dr. Farsalinos' is the best, and the Spectator article most encouraging, given it's reach to the general public.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.