“Public Health Challenges of Electronic Cigarettes in South Korea” [JPMPH]

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tom09

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 22, 2009
504
125
Germany
ANTZ commentary paper:

S. Lee, H. Kimm, J. E. Yun, S. H. Jee (2011) Public Health Challenges of Electronic Cigarettes in South Korea. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 44, 235-241.

Abstract:
Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarrettes) were recently introduced and advertised as a smoking cession device in South Korea. As the social norm to quit smoking has gained hold in the country, the number of e-cigarette users is growing rapidly. This phenomenon should be urgently considered, because of the lack of research that has been conducted to examine the safety of e-cigarettes and its efficacy as a smoking cessation aid.
This paper raises several public health concerns on e-cigarettes in South Korea. Uncertain regulations of the government on e-cigarettes are contributing to an increase of e-cigarette users and allowing the e-cigarette industry to circumvent existing regulations. The aggressive marketing activity of this industry is also a core factor that is responsible for the rapid increase of e-cigarette use, in particular among the youth. Following the enforcement of tobacco control, some cigarette smokers may be encouraged to purchase e-cigarettes in order to circumvent the regulations, even though the dual use of e-cigarette and cigarette may be more harmful.
Until there is clear evidence of the e-cigarette‘s safety, it is recommended that the industry‘s marketing and promotional activities be banned and closely monitored, and public campaigns be initiated to educate the public regarding e-cigarettes.

direct link to full pdf
 
"Until there is clear evidence of the e-cigarette‘s safety, it is recommended that the industry‘s marketing and promotional activities be banned and closely monitored, and public campaigns be initiated to educate the public regarding e-cigarettes."

How, exactly, does one demonstrate safety of a product? If there is risk or actual harm, I know how to demonstrate that...but I would really appreciate if one of these supposed "Doctors" could explain how to scientifically prove the ABSENCE of harm.

Would it, for example, be enough to prove that all of the known harmful components have been eliminated?? If that is proof of safety, you need look no further than the FDA's own study or even THIS study that fails to show any actual risks or document how it is that they suppose that dual use of e-cigarettes could even POSSIBLY be "more harmful"

These people need their doctorates REVOKED.

Argumentum ad Ignorantiam
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread