A new GG line

Would you prefer to see the GGs threaded from now on, for 510 connections?

  • Yes. It is about time someone would ask!

  • No! I love 901s and I'm also a fan of Chuck Norris.

  • I don't care and I wonder what you're talking about or what I'm still doing here.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

imeothanasis

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 13, 2009
47,882
34,510
Athens, Hellas
gg-goldengreek.com
thinner Mist? The telescope dont allow us to make a very thin one. GGTS would be thinner (at 21mm) without the telescope. If I make a GGTS with the ability to fit 17mm batteries like the GGTB then it would br at least 22mm. It is at 23mm now so there is no point here as you see.:)
 

Mist_Of_Joye

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2009
888
9
Beirut-Lebanon
thinner Mist? The telescope dont allow us to make a very thin one. GGTS would be thinner (at 21mm) without the telescope. If I make a GGTS with the ability to fit 17mm batteries like the GGTB then it would br at least 22mm. It is at 23mm now so there is no point here as you see.:)

Fine.

Then here is another suggestion:

1- A cap for the GGTB that includes the famous 4 in 1 connector.
2- An optional series of short tubes for the GGTB to take only , either 1 CR123 battery, or 1 CR2 battery, or 2 CR2 batteries.
3- An other optional system that makes the GGTB like the transformer.

This way, the GGTB will become at the same time, GGTB, super Nano, Nano and transformer...Depending on the mood.:hubba:
 

Mist_Of_Joye

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2009
888
9
Beirut-Lebanon
1 and 2 are nice Mist. And I will seriously think of it as an update. The 3 is impossible again because sections act like telescope. They will increase the width just like the telescope does.

Go for 1 and 2 Imeo...It would be awesome!

I would personally definitely order all sizes: Micro, mini, tall and Grande ...hehe
 

Ways

Full Member
Verified Member
Oct 8, 2010
56
13
Hertfordshire, England
I wouldn't have any use for a 4 in 1 connector myself as i use 901 atties and 808 carto's although i appreciate the design aspect in the GGTS and if it came as part of a GGTB AVS i would be all for it with one caveat... don't make a GGTB AVS that is larger in diameter than the GGTB! i read that part about an AVS that can be transferred from the GGTS to the GGTB and that causes me slight concern as in my opinion an AVS for the GGTB should be a continuation of its sleek form.

BTW i love LR901's in my AVS but Chuck Norris can't handle the flavour from a 901 and has to use 13amp fuse wire for an atty powered by a 12v yacht battery and uses crude oil as a base for mixing his e-liquid, what a guy. :laugh:
 

perpetua

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 8, 2010
529
170
UK
Lol at Drozd and perpetua...:laugh:

Moi! :ohmy:

Tehe . . . see Wayne has now joined us in isolated splendour. :laugh:

Honestly, really don't mind whether I use a 510 or a 901 atomiser . . . have to say since recieving
my GGTB have re-discovered how pleasant vaping with a LR901 is.

Know you guys have strong passions on the subject but I'm quite happy with either . . . now if we were talking Jimmy Choo's . . . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread