Ok some first impressions now that I'm back home and of course immediately started in on the Achilles 2.
- It's shorter. A nice five mil shorter? Me likey. PI, what do your calipers say?
- Shiny. Engraving is visibly nicer than the clone. And the threads are way smoother. It does not say "Achilles II -- just Achilles.
- It was pretty greasy with oil when unwrapped, so I set about cleaning it. Totally disassembled it, finding that the design remains very close to the Achilles "one" (clone) in design, but even simpler. That dead-simple design is a great feature of the Achilles and I'd hoped it wasn't altered. The white insulator plate underneath the deck is gone, replaced with a small round delrin disk and a black o-ring which insulate the positive pin assembly. The o-ring sits in a nice recessed seat machined into the deck's substructure. It's so simple and streamlined I really didn't need to disassemble it entirely to get it clean and there was a little messing around to get the deck re-seated right. So I don't recommend a full disassembly esp if you're eager to get vaping! About every bit and piece has one if not several replacements provided.
- The air flow ring is well designed and doesn't get involved in the refilling process like on the magma, so that's awesome. It rotates easily without spinning free due to the way it interacts with that same o-ring from the original/clone that seats the main tube with the base.
- And now the kinda big part: You can set the air flow ring to obtain a full on open draw if you for some reason want that, and/but can close it entirely, and select any gradient in between including the exact draw we've come to know and love from the FiF clone and ....wait for it ... every single air flow level flows smoothly and much more quietly and less raggedly than the original clone. Really really nice. Yes, he didn't screw up the most important aspect of this atty by designing in more airflow options, which was in my mind the biggest question/concern.
Very happy so far! Everything I didn't mention seems just the same. The top cap is a tiny bit different on both inside and outside but I don't detect anything functionally different nor anything that might affect wicking or that issue I seem to no longer have with the wicks coming out of place.
That's it for initial impressions.
- It's shorter. A nice five mil shorter? Me likey. PI, what do your calipers say?
- Shiny. Engraving is visibly nicer than the clone. And the threads are way smoother. It does not say "Achilles II -- just Achilles.
- It was pretty greasy with oil when unwrapped, so I set about cleaning it. Totally disassembled it, finding that the design remains very close to the Achilles "one" (clone) in design, but even simpler. That dead-simple design is a great feature of the Achilles and I'd hoped it wasn't altered. The white insulator plate underneath the deck is gone, replaced with a small round delrin disk and a black o-ring which insulate the positive pin assembly. The o-ring sits in a nice recessed seat machined into the deck's substructure. It's so simple and streamlined I really didn't need to disassemble it entirely to get it clean and there was a little messing around to get the deck re-seated right. So I don't recommend a full disassembly esp if you're eager to get vaping! About every bit and piece has one if not several replacements provided.
- The air flow ring is well designed and doesn't get involved in the refilling process like on the magma, so that's awesome. It rotates easily without spinning free due to the way it interacts with that same o-ring from the original/clone that seats the main tube with the base.
- And now the kinda big part: You can set the air flow ring to obtain a full on open draw if you for some reason want that, and/but can close it entirely, and select any gradient in between including the exact draw we've come to know and love from the FiF clone and ....wait for it ... every single air flow level flows smoothly and much more quietly and less raggedly than the original clone. Really really nice. Yes, he didn't screw up the most important aspect of this atty by designing in more airflow options, which was in my mind the biggest question/concern.
Very happy so far! Everything I didn't mention seems just the same. The top cap is a tiny bit different on both inside and outside but I don't detect anything functionally different nor anything that might affect wicking or that issue I seem to no longer have with the wicks coming out of place.
That's it for initial impressions.
Last edited: