- Status
Cool, I have thought about a solar panel on my hat to keep the PV recharged on an all day hiking trail.
(But because I can't hike all day anymore I gave up).
(But because I can't hike all day anymore I gave up).
I like the way it looks like a CB unit. 
Great stuff! Raidy, you didn't by chance climb up on top of the Wohnwagen to take this pic did you? That unit looks mighty like the standard issue for a fleet of 9 such French campers holed up in a parking lot below my balcony, not the most romantic spot but the campgrounds aren't open yet LOL.
Great stuff! Raidy, you didn't by chance climb up on top of the Wohnwagen to take this pic did you? That unit looks mighty like the standard issue for a fleet of 9 such French campers holed up in a parking lot below my balcony, not the most romantic spot but the campgrounds aren't open yet LOL.raidy your making me jealous with all those nice steam machines you keep developping
all i want is one satifying mean steam machine
i wish i was your neighbor lol
do you need a testing person lol
hows the new prototype coming a long ?
all i want is one satifying mean steam machine
i wish i was your neighbor lol
do you need a testing person lol
hows the new prototype coming a long ?
Last edited:
I have read some of this new sistem in German forum with google trans and this man is a genius.
Really I want one. Sure
I´m waiting for more notice
Here you get one. Prints it out, cut it off, he's yours :
http://img5.fotos-hochladen.net/uploads/mc00wo9b2a48jn.jpg
my English is too bad to explain it.
Here is the goolge-Translation from my german thread: ( I hope you can understand the allmost o f it.)
Greetings
Raidy
The all-new vapor control
As promised, I declare to you my new development, as they "secured" (utility model and the following patent). And so it is now. In about 2-3 months then it stands officially at the DPMA and any reproduction is protected. The invention is thus secured from now, a replica only theoretically possible in 2-3 months.
But this time no one comes to this "very special" components.
But before we get to explanation, first of all the problems here:
The problem:
Let's think back to the time of the pyro-smoking:
1) If we draw heavily, you get a lot of smoke and hot.
2) If we draw weak, you get less and less hot smoke.
One can thus define the migratory behavior of smoke through his strength. Surely you know that the first cigarette in the morning. Since you have a couple of times really badly and then normal. In general it takes a cigarette, never equal a strong one but always depending on the mood (and Addictions 1007).
And how it is when steaming?
1) There was / is it the draft switch. The only known ON or OFF.
2) Since there are battery carrier with push-button. They know only ON or OFF.
3) Since there are adjustable battery carrier. The rules can be mild to severe. But ultimately they know of a single ON or OFF.
Where this is the problem?
The false sense of steam:
1) There is always the same amount of liquid / second for evaporation. If one assumes a strong and variable support on battery pulls strongly, then you have "strong" steam. But if we faint, then you have "too strong Steam". To set it to "normal" and pulls strongly, then you have "thin" vapor. If one is weak it is still too "strong".
Actually, you should consider prior to each train, how much you want to move and then adjust the tension on it. But this is totally impractical.
The wrong temperature steam:
A very strong set or wrapped in heavy pulling evaporator produces the optimal amount of aerosol and thus the desired flavor.
In light pull but he totally overheated. This may not be truly healthy, because the evaporation takes place just under circumstances to be called.
Reversed way provides a weak or weakly coiled evaporator set far too thin aerosol when it pulls strongly. That's just it, that there is no sufficient amount of air through evaporation.
Why the switch is actually enforced?
1) Since the pull switch (ON / OFF) is extremely unreliable and prone to error were / are.
2) Because YOUR exactly with the probe can this "little steam / steam much" simulate something. Observed even at the times you steaming. Do you want to press it hard, then you already on it in advance so that enough steam is also yes. Do you want it weaker, then you push on it very briefly, but still moves slightly.
The success of the probe was then on the unreliability of the cord-and individual ways of influencing Dampfmengen-/Temperatur-.
The controllability of the voltage is only a possibility and further increase this influence due to the fact that the behavior of a Pyro comes a little closer.
The solution:
A controller should adjust the evaporation rate constant at the current platoon.
A little pull = less power, pull strong = strong performance.
Thus one always has an equally "thick" steam, no matter how hard you pull straight out. Only one has a slight pull in just a few steam and a strong pull a lot of steam - just like in a normal cigarette, too.
I've spent hours and days trying to study "normal" steamer when steaming and to identify their key / tensile properties.
Does this really a lot?
Oh yes, it is a completely new and different sense of steam. Rolling Eyes The few prototype testers were surprised by the result. At first I was not sure if the effort is worthwhile. Today I know that it is a completely different steaming - a new generation of Dampfens.
And how does it work now?
In principle, very simple, very complex in implementation.
The new control system responds to the barometric pressure change in the steamer. If one light, so it provides little power. If one strong, so it makes a lot of power.
So you can take a "strong" train, which then almost a skin or a slight train.
The new controller can even change within the thickness of a train. For this purpose, approximately 10 times / second of air pressure measured in the evaporator and the strength to immediately controlled.
So you can easily pull in a train, and intense, and receives light and heavy vapor.
The end of the voltage regulation?
In principle, yes. Because I can only move through the setup mode to set, in which tensile strength 100% power should be available. Subtracting the setup strong, so is a normal train a Mallborro Light, a lighter train a Mallborro Ultralight, a strong train a normal Mallborro.
Subtracting the setup only weak, then even a slight one Mallboro train, a train a strong REVAL. 1007
As should now be built to the right evaporator?
Of course there is a weak weak evaporator evaporator. It does not control this.
But their boat Selbstwickler can now handle up to 100% too high and adjust the setup using steam power. Thus, a power-GLV to be gentle breeze or wild boar.
So you can steam with a strong winding and sometimes gently, without changing the winding must. And you can control it easily with the tensile strength, rumzuschrauben without permanently on the voltage.
Setup sounds so complicated?
The setup is a breeze, I put out the highest value. How does it work?
1) You blow again briefly in the evaporator.
2) Now, an LED blinks for 10 seconds.
3) Now you just pull on the evaporator.
The highest tensile strength during these 10 seconds are now 100% steamship line.
Dies within the 10 seconds you do not, then the future always steamer at 100% power, no matter how hard you pull on it.
You prefer "moderate", then you also have to "medium high" train will hold 100% power.
You prefer strong, then you must continue to draw more heavily, so you have 100%. A normal train corresponds to a rather weak Dampfie.
I back away from the switch and never?
I also thought that many will think that way. Anyone who has seen the scrap of Zugschaltern and knows the benefits of the switch will probably keep anything of Control, I thought. But all proto testers thought after a day completely differently.
This type of control is the real pyro-smoking very, very close.
The sensor also keeps the time?
Nope, just so around 100 million trains?
Yes, he has no moving parts. Since nothing can stick. He does not come into contact with the liquid, even when the steamer drooling.
Other:
I have pretty much everything by barometric sensors, which are available on the world market. Somehow, all had their problems and hook - and if it was just the price! But then I found one that met all the properties and after a modification was used. It matches a match head, and unfortunately is not like a normal SMD component soldered, but requires a very special be soldered. This makes a manual reconstruction impossible. My prototype was created under the microscope at an incredibly nerve-wracking fiddly job.
A genital surgery on an aphid would have been easier. And because this is so, a WBG also made no sense. Because the set-up costs of the special machine for applying this component likely safe until <5000. Only a commercial production makes sense. And I am a full disclosure would only play into the hands of pirates.
What's next?
Electra-pipes has received the first license to clone. Since she just got in the search and organization of special parts and companies have been very supportive, they get the license now only once exclusively for a certain time. Besides this I have with licensing electra-pipes, but no business relationships. And to my expenses ever again there are a lot of water will run down the Rhine .....
! I produce, I do not sell, I'm no retail business!
(Some are probably assume I still lust for money, although this was not my motivation for this development)
Now go once a few prototypes to test me very familiar boat, while Electra-pipes can get started soon. But until then, if no amendments rest of the test users more.
Well, the cat is finally out of the bag and I feel much more comfortable. Wink Sorry for the long wait.
The new evaporator is still there and there but still needs some time.
The new control system together with the new evaporator, which guarantees an optimal evaporation temperature should be a new dream team. By the way: Approx. 1500 hours for the Regelung.Wub
I apologize again for so long that I'll put on the rack and I hope you understand it now. Future innovations I will no longer announce to me to avoid the unnecessary headwind. And now i have only once the first 3500 refer to the patent attorney. Burned development cost (excluding labor, law, DPMA) were about 5000 .
greetings
Raidy
..I'll go second!
Congrats 'raidy' and thanks for updating us here. I skimmed and will re-read your post, but it sounds amazing!
Congrats 'raidy' and thanks for updating us here. I skimmed and will re-read your post, but it sounds amazing!
Oh, nice! Excellent news to hear, thanks raidy. I will have to go and read the original text now.
For anyone wondering, 'train' = 'Zug' = 'drag' or 'draw' or even for Grimm 'toot'
For anyone wondering, 'train' = 'Zug' = 'drag' or 'draw' or even for Grimm 'toot'
@adaq: Es wäre ser nett, wenn du die Übersetzungsfehler raus nimmst. (Would be nice, if you check the translation errors )
link: http://www.e-rauchen-forum.de/thread-51549.html
link: http://www.e-rauchen-forum.de/thread-51549.html
Last edited:
This is Number one of two. Number two is a complete new atty (next month.....)
raidy, I didn't understand what it's all about... New atomizer arrived? Or what?
Here you get one. Prints it out, cut it off, he's yours :
http://img5.fotos-hochladen.net/uploads/mc00wo9b2a48jn.jpg
my English is too bad to explain it.
Here is the goolge-Translation from my german thread: ( I hope you can understand the allmost o f it.)
Greetings
Raidy
The all-new vapor control
As promised, I announce to you my new development, as they have "secured" (utility model and the following patent). And so it is now. In about 2-3 months then it stands officially in the DPMA and any reproduction is protected. The invention is thus secured from now, and a production replica only theoretically possible in 2-3 months.
But at this time no one gets to these "very special" components.
But before we get to explanation, first of all the problems here:
The problem:
Let's think back to the time of the analogue smoking:
1) If we draw heavily, you get a lot of hot smoke.
2) If we draw lightly, you get less and cooler smoke.
One can thus define the strength of the smoke through drawing behavior. Surely you know that the first cigarette in the morning. Since you have a couple of deep drags and then continue smoking normally. In general one takes a variety of drags, never equally strong but always dependent on the mood (and Addictions).
And how it is when vaping?
1) There was / is it the auto switch. The which only has the ON or OFF position.
2) There are battery mods with push-button. They know only ON or OFF.
3) There are adjustable battery mods. They can be regulated from mild to heavy. But ultimately they know of a single ON or OFF.
From what is the problem?
The false sense of vaping:
1) There is always the same amount of liquid / second for vaporizing. If one assumes a variable mod to high voltage draws strongly, then you have "strong" vapor. But if we draw lightly, then you have "too strong vape". If the voltage is set to "normal" and one draws strongly, then you have "thin" vapor. If one draws lightly it is still too "strong".
Actually, you should consider prior to each drag, how much you want to vape and then adjust the voltage to that. But this is totally impractical.
The wrong temperature vape:
A very hot coil or high voltage setting with a heavy draw produces the optimal amount of aerosol and thus the desired flavor.
In light drags it is totally overheated. This can't be actually healthy, because the evaporation takes place under too hot conditions.
The opposite setting provides a weak voltage or weakly coiled evaporator produces too thin an aerosol when one draws strongly. That's just it, that there is not sufficient vapor for that amount of air.
What made the switch actually popular?
1) Since the auto switch (ON / OFF) is extremely unreliable and is/ was prone to error.
2) Because YOU exactly with the switch can simulate this "little vapor/ lots of vapor" effect. Observe your own vaping behavior. Do you want it heavy, then you already press on it in advance so that enough steam will be there. Do you want it weaker, then you push on it very briefly, but still draw after releasing.
The success of the switch was then from the unreliability of the auto switch and individual ways of influencing vapor amount /temperature.
The control-ability of the voltage is only an extension and further amplification of this influence due to the fact that the behavior of a analogue comes a little closer.
The solution:
A controller should adjust the evaporation rate constant relative to the current draw strength.
A little draw= less power, draw strong = strong performance.
Thus one always has an equally "thick" vapor, no matter how hard you draw on it. Only one in reality has just a little vapor with a light draw and a strong pull a lot of vapor- just like in a normal cigarette, too.
I've spent hours and days trying to study "normal" atomizers when vaping and to identify their draw / tensile properties.
Does this really matter a lot?
Oh yes, it is a completely new and different sense of vaping.The few prototype testers were surprised by the result. At first I was not sure if the effort is worthwhile. Today I know that it is a completely different vaping- a new generation of vaping.
And how does it work now?
In principle, very simple, very complex in implementation.
The new control system responds to the barometric pressure change in the atomizer. If one draws lightly, so it provides little power. If one draws strongly, so it makes a lot of power.
So you can take a "strong" drag, which then almost knocks you over, or a slight drag.
The new controller can even change within the draw itself. For this purpose, approximately 10 times / second of air pressure is measured in the atomizer and the strength to it is immediately controlled.
So you can draw in a single drag, both light and intense, and receive light and heavy vapor.
The end of the voltage regulation?
In principle, yes. Because one can only draw through the setup mode to set, at which draw strength 100% power should be available. Drawing during the setup strongly, so is a normal drag a Marlborro Light, a lighter drag a Mallborro Ultralight, a strong drag a normal Mallborro Red.
Drawing during the setup only weakly, then even a slight one is a Mallboro drag, and a strong draw a REVAL.
How should the appropriate atomizer be built?
Of course there are weak atomizers that will remain weak atomizers. This controller does not change this.
But coil winders can now wrap strong coils at 100% and adjust the strength through setup mode. Thus, a power-GLV can be set to be gentle breeze or a wild boar.
So you can vape with a strong winding and sometimes gently, without needing to change the coil. And you can control it easily with the tensile strength, without constant messing with the voltage.
Setup mode sounds so complicated?
The setup is a breeze, I put highest value on this. How does it work?
1) You blow once briefly in the atomizer.
2) Now, an LED blinks for 10 seconds.
3) Now you just draw on the atomizer.
The highest tensile strength measured during these 10 seconds are now the 100% setting.
If you do not draw during these 10 second, then the future setting for vaping will always be at 100% power, no matter how hard you draw on it.
If you draw "moderate", then you also have to "medium high" draw to hold 100% power.
You prefer strong, then you must continue to draw more heavily, so you have 100%. A normal draw corresponds to a rather weak vape.
I back away from the switch and forever?
I also thought that many will think that way. Anyone who has seen the junk of auto switches and knows the benefits of the pushbutton switch will probably keep away from any auto switch, I thought. But all proto testers thought after a day completely differently.
This type of controlling is the real analogue-smoking very, very close.
Does the sensor last a long time?
Nope, just so around 100 million drags.
Yes, it has no moving parts. Since nothing can stick. He does not come into contact with the liquid, even when the atomizer leaking.
Other:
I have looked at pretty much everything about barometric sensors, which are available on the world market. Somehow, all had their problems and issues- and if it was just the price! But then I found one that met all the properties and after a modification was usable. It fits on a match head, and unfortunately is not like a normal SMD component solder-able, but requires a very special soldering technique. This makes a manual reconstruction impossible. My prototype was created under the microscope at an incredibly nerve-wracking fiddly job.
A genital surgery on an aphid would have been easier. And because this is so, a Co-op also made no sense. Because the set-up costs of the special machine for applying this component likely safe until <5000 pieces. Only a commercial production makes sense. And my full disclosure would only play into the hands of pirates.
What's next?
Electra-pipes has received the first license to produce these. Since they just got in the search and organization of special parts and companies have been very supportive, they get the license now exclusively for a certain time to start. Besides this I have with licensing electra-pipes, but no business relationships. And to see my expenses ever again there are a lot of water will run down the Rhine .....
! I don't produce, I do not sell, I'm no retail business!
(Some are probably assume I still lust for money, although this was not my motivation for this development)
Now go first a few prototypes to testers, while Electra-pipes can get started soon. But only then, if no amendments from the test users come up.
Well, the cat is finally out of the bag and I feel much more comfortable.
The new atomizors still there and there but still needs some time.
The new control system together with the new atomizer, which guarantees an optimal evaporation temperature should be a new dream team. By the way: Approx. 1500 hours for the controller .
I apologize again for so long that I'll put on the rack and I hope you understand it now. Future innovations I will no longer announce to me to avoid the unnecessary headwind. And now I have to transfer the first 3500 € fee to the patent attorney. Burned development costs (excluding labor, legal, DPMA) were about 5000 €.
greetings
Raidy
Enjoy!
The quote contains many fixes
Last edited:
Sounds great!! I shall keep my eyes peeled for a commercially produced version!! Thanks for sharing again Raidy!!
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
