All my mods part1

Status
Not open for further replies.

raidy

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 26, 2010
437
604
Germany
All I need is more time

As said, i have no time for this project at the moment. I'm so sorry for that, but my other invention (not e-smoking) is to importent to wait.

As a small excuse a picture of the new genisis. He has no Kanthal, no heating element and no electric direct mash heating.

pat8c0ivygd.jpg


Please don't ask, how it works - it works from "little breeze" to "big vapor cloud" without changing any hardware.

Please give me more time :oops:
 
Last edited:

traderdan

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 3, 2009
203
25
North Texas
Raidy
I know your Busy with your new work . All of us have waited close to two months for part 2. Can you project a time we will get to see it . Its a lot easier to wait when you know how long you will wait . I think many have seen great builders in our forum . Some of the great builders, have just left never to be seen or heard from again .I know some worry about never seeing a part 2.
I don't mean to be pushy. And don't want you to think I'm not grateful, for sharing your Knowledge . I am anxious to see your proto type patent be done and be marketed . So we could buy it or make it .
 

raidy

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 26, 2010
437
604
Germany
I have no time at the moment, but i show you a atty without wire.
Want you see it?
Proto 1
indu2pcu1y68r9.jpg

Proto 2
und3xw7eicf93.jpg


It work with an inductive coil wich heats the mash directly. Give me some more weeks and i make a real usable atty. At the moment i'm working 26h/day on a new invention and have no second for my hobby.

!! NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE! PROTECTET from Raidy by DPMA Markenschutz!!
 
Last edited:

asdaq

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
4,570
1,845
poland, and the brassy lands of google
Wow indeed. Now that is some serious style raidy, can't wait for more.

Gummy, if you still have your cigar going, I got similar bad results as you did when my mouthpiece hole was smaller than the intake hole, not to the point of condensate problems, but really lackluster performance, puffs, but no real vapor to play with. A hole with the same size or greater by a bit and it's OK again. You tried various combinations with hole sizes right?
 

Gummy Bear

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 10, 2010
4,733
11,947
orlando fl
agummybear.deviantart.com
Gummy, if you still have your cigar going, I got similar bad results as you did when my mouthpiece hole was smaller than the intake hole, not to the point of condensate problems, but really lackluster performance, puffs, but no real vapor to play with. A hole with the same size or greater by a bit and it's OK again. You tried various combinations with hole sizes right?

It's worth a try
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread