All my mods part1

[santo19586]

hello Raidy, thank you for your work , and showing me how to better my vaping expierience,
A toast to you in the new year..

 

[chuckie]

HAPPY NEW YEAR Raidy,and thanks.

 

[thejager]

some of the best work done in all of vaping

 

[raidy]

A pipe without a battery

This pipe has no electronics, no battery but it works 4-5 hours.
Its not possible to open the pipe, top and bottom are fixed.
When you put liquid in the upper hole, it beginns to vape.

What do you think as this pipe is working?

Solution comes later

 

[slopes]

My guess is a catalytic convertor from a zippo hand warmer???... I tried to build one using this idea - but failed

 

[raidy]

1) It works 4-5 hours.
2) Opening is not possible!
3) After that time i need 5 seconds "handling" to work another 4-5 hours, by NOT opening top or bottom.

Its soooooo siiiiiiimmmmmmppppplllllleeeee.........don't catch me guys.

 

[slopes]

OK - a nightlight candle.

 

[asdaq]

Oh yeah, a tealight (Teelicht) candle heats in the wooden base, and the pipe is like a little Turkish coffee maker pot. LOL I followed the text description too close.

 

[raidy]

Ey,you had looked in german forum? Thats not fair

Inside a ss-tube with ss-mesh.

But next time i post it same sides at the same moment

 

[asdaq]

Actually no, I haven't looked yet even. Slopes distracted me to look at several zippo hand warmer videos on youtube, (also a short zippo tricks video ) came back and you both had responded.

Very clever raidy, gives new meaning to 'cooking some juice'.

 

[slopes]

Ey,you had looked in german forum? Thats not fair
:

Nope - just a (second) guess.

Exploring the possibilities of non-electric vaping is a very good idea. ECF don't appear to be very keen though (they closed a thread about it down a few weeks ago)

 

[dsy5]

Ey,you had looked in german forum? Thats not fair

Inside a ss-tube with ss-mesh.

But next time i post it same sides at the same moment

You sir, are too clever for your own good! I've been away from this thread for a while, but you never cease to amaze me, Raidy. I'd like to get a close look at that meshless vapor volcano you posted earlier.

 

[PLANofMAN]

Finally made it to the end...
and what do I find? The electrical, technological genius who kicked this thing off is playing with candles!? (Yay! a simple mod for the Zombie Apocalypse!)

"Originally Posted by raidy

Here you get one. Prints it out, cut it off, he's yours :
http://img5.fotos-hochladen.net/uplo...wo9b2a48jn.jpg

my English is too bad to explain it.

Here is the goolge-Translation from my german thread: ( I hope you can understand the allmost o f it.)

Greetings
Raidy

The all-new vapor control

As promised, I announce to you my new development, as they have "secured" (utility model and the following patent). And so it is now. In about 2-3 months then it stands officially in the DPMA and any reproduction is protected. The invention is thus secured from now, and a production replica only theoretically possible in 2-3 months.
But at this time no one gets to these "very special" components.

But before we get to explanation, first of all the problems here:

The problem:

Let's think back to the time of the analogue smoking:

1) If we draw heavily, you get a lot of hot smoke.
2) If we draw lightly, you get less and cooler smoke.

One can thus define the strength of the smoke through drawing behavior. Surely you know that the first cigarette in the morning. Since you have a couple of deep drags and then continue smoking normally. In general one takes a variety of drags, never equally strong but always dependent on the mood (and Addictions ).

And how it is when vaping?

1) There was / is it the auto switch. The which only has the ON or OFF position.
2) There are battery mods with push-button. They know only ON or OFF.
3) There are adjustable battery mods. They can be regulated from mild to heavy. But ultimately they know of a single ON or OFF.

From what is the problem?

The false sense of vaping:

1) There is always the same amount of liquid / second for vaporizing. If one assumes a variable mod to high voltage draws strongly, then you have "strong" vapor. But if we draw lightly, then you have "too strong vape". If the voltage is set to "normal" and one draws strongly, then you have "thin" vapor. If one draws lightly it is still too "strong".
Actually, you should consider prior to each drag, how much you want to vape and then adjust the voltage to that. But this is totally impractical.

The wrong temperature vape:

A very hot coil or high voltage setting with a heavy draw produces the optimal amount of aerosol and thus the desired flavor.
In light drags it is totally overheated. This can't be actually healthy, because the evaporation takes place under too hot conditions.
The opposite setting provides a weak voltage or weakly coiled evaporator produces too thin an aerosol when one draws strongly. That's just it, that there is not sufficient vapor for that amount of air.

What made the switch actually popular?

1) Since the auto switch (ON / OFF) is extremely unreliable and is/ was prone to error.
2) Because YOU exactly with the switch can simulate this "little vapor/ lots of vapor" effect. Observe your own vaping behavior. Do you want it heavy, then you already press on it in advance so that enough steam will be there. Do you want it weaker, then you push on it very briefly, but still draw after releasing.
The success of the switch was then from the unreliability of the auto switch and individual ways of influencing vapor amount /temperature.
The control-ability of the voltage is only an extension and further amplification of this influence due to the fact that the behavior of a analogue comes a little closer.



The solution:

A controller should adjust the evaporation rate constant relative to the current draw strength.
A little draw= less power, draw strong = strong performance.

Thus one always has an equally "thick" vapor, no matter how hard you draw on it. Only one in reality has just a little vapor with a light draw and a strong pull a lot of vapor- just like in a normal cigarette, too.
I've spent hours and days trying to study "normal" atomizers when vaping and to identify their draw / tensile properties.

Does this really matter a lot?

Oh yes, it is a completely new and different sense of vaping. The few prototype testers were surprised by the result. At first I was not sure if the effort is worthwhile. Today I know that it is a completely different vaping- a new generation of vaping.

And how does it work now?

In principle, very simple, very complex in implementation.
The new control system responds to the barometric pressure change in the atomizer. If one draws lightly, so it provides little power. If one draws strongly, so it makes a lot of power.
So you can take a "strong" drag, which then almost knocks you over, or a slight drag.
The new controller can even change within the draw itself. For this purpose, approximately 10 times / second of air pressure is measured in the atomizer and the strength to it is immediately controlled.
So you can draw in a single drag, both light and intense, and receive light and heavy vapor.

The end of the voltage regulation?

In principle, yes. Because one can only draw through the setup mode to set, at which draw strength 100% power should be available. Drawing during the setup strongly, so is a normal drag a Marlborro Light, a lighter drag a Mallborro Ultralight, a strong drag a normal Mallborro Red.
Drawing during the setup only weakly, then even a slight one is a Mallboro drag, and a strong draw a REVAL.

How should the appropriate atomizer be built?

Of course there are weak atomizers that will remain weak atomizers. This controller does not change this.
But coil winders can now wrap strong coils at 100% and adjust the strength through setup mode. Thus, a power-GLV can be set to be gentle breeze or a wild boar.
So you can vape with a strong winding and sometimes gently, without needing to change the coil. And you can control it easily with the tensile strength, without constant messing with the voltage.

Setup mode sounds so complicated?
The setup is a breeze, I put highest value on this. How does it work?
1) You blow once briefly in the atomizer.
2) Now, an LED blinks for 10 seconds.
3) Now you just draw on the atomizer.
The highest tensile strength measured during these 10 seconds are now the 100% setting.
If you do not draw during these 10 second, then the future setting for vaping will always be at 100% power, no matter how hard you draw on it.
If you draw "moderate", then you also have to "medium high" draw to hold 100% power.
You prefer strong, then you must continue to draw more heavily, so you have 100%. A normal draw corresponds to a rather weak vape.

I back away from the switch and forever?

I also thought that many will think that way. Anyone who has seen the junk of auto switches and knows the benefits of the pushbutton switch will probably keep away from any auto switch, I thought. But all proto testers thought after a day completely differently.

This type of controlling is the real analogue-smoking very, very close.


Does the sensor last a long time?

Nope, just so around 100 million drags.
Yes, it has no moving parts. Since nothing can stick. He does not come into contact with the liquid, even when the atomizer leaking.

Other:

I have looked at pretty much everything about barometric sensors, which are available on the world market. Somehow, all had their problems and issues- and if it was just the price! But then I found one that met all the properties and after a modification was usable. It fits on a match head, and unfortunately is not like a normal SMD component solder-able, but requires a very special soldering technique. This makes a manual reconstruction impossible. My prototype was created under the microscope at an incredibly nerve-wracking fiddly job.


A genital surgery on an aphid would have been easier. And because this is so, a Co-op also made no sense. Because the set-up costs of the special machine for applying this component likely safe until <5000 pieces. Only a commercial production makes sense. And my full disclosure would only play into the hands of pirates.

What's next?

Electra-pipes has received the first license to produce these. Since they just got in the search and organization of special parts and companies have been very supportive, they get the license now exclusively for a certain time to start. Besides this I have with licensing electra-pipes, but no business relationships. And to see my expenses ever again there are a lot of water will run down the Rhine .....

! I don't produce, I do not sell, I'm no retail business!
(Some are probably assume I still lust for money, although this was not my motivation for this development)

Now go first a few prototypes to testers, while Electra-pipes can get started soon. But only then, if no amendments from the test users come up.

Well, the cat is finally out of the bag and I feel much more comfortable. Sorry for the long wait.

The new atomizors still there and there but still needs some time.
The new control system together with the new atomizer, which guarantees an optimal evaporation temperature should be a new dream team. By the way: Approx. 1500 hours for the controller .

I apologize again for so long that I'll put on the rack and I hope you understand it now. Future innovations I will no longer announce to me to avoid the unnecessary headwind. And now I have to transfer the first 3500 € fee to the patent attorney. Burned development costs (excluding labor, legal, DPMA) were about 5000 €.

greetings
Raidy"

Jaw drop moment. Seriously. Later generations will point to your post and say, "This was the moment when vaping became a modern phenomenon." They might edit out the part about "A genital surgery on an aphid would have been easier."

I have the skill to make a Genisis Atomizer, but not the tools at the moment, so my next atty purchase will be an NV from electra-pipes, to support your goals for licensed sales or hand-built only. I already bought a Chinese version, but that was before I knew of your request that the Genisis not be commercialized. For that, I humbly apologize. My only excuse is ignorance.

Gummy Bear, where's my points?

 

[jun0felix]

hola raidy, you did not loose your good sense of developping. enjoy

 

[perlionsmitnick]

Ey,you had looked in german forum? Thats not fair

Inside a ss-tube with ss-mesh.

But next time i post it same sides at the same moment

A SternoPipe. I like it. Raidy do you have any experience with porous ceramics?

 

[raidy]

I tested porous ceramics as early as 2011 and the results announced in the German forum.
Summary: Porous ceramic works and does not work.
Why?
The porosity is low, the ceramic clogged very quickly by the liquid residues.
Is the porosity big liquid runs out.

But since I have another solution, I'm going to invest any more time in porous ceramics.
And i hope that i can show it in the next tree month. It depends not on me, there are othe problems.
But thats a difficult story.

 

[Cyrus Vap]

I heard stainless steel mesh works pretty good Raidy

Thank YOU sir !

 

[jpcosta]

Raidy your inventions are amazing! Please continue the good work you are doing to bring us these amazing things!

 

[SloHand]

Thanks for compliments!
In Germany we say "Danke fuer die Blumen (Thanks for the flowers)"
At the moment i'm working hard on a completely other project.

Therefore, I can not present something here at the moment, sorry.
.
.
.
.
Nothing?
.
.
O.K., a new idea, but it's not finished at the moment.

Questions?
Answers:
1) Yes, is inside. called mamba
2) Yes the 3 setting rings are for adjusting the parameters.

The rest is Top Secret at then moment.

Please give me more time. I have a million ideas but only 24h a day


Greetings
Raidy

Any more information available on this unit Raidy? I'd love to see a picture with a ruler beside it

Your work is simply astounding!

 

[jduncan]

Truly next-level, Raidy! Reading the above posts have been like looking into the future -I can't wait!

Also, I am in LOVE with the "sterno-pipe"! Looks like a brilliant little device. Keep up the good work!