Are you kidding me???

Status
Not open for further replies.

StuckinLA

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 22, 2010
205
83
68
Winston Salem, NC
staccato1.jpg


Is it me or does this kinda look like it has an atomizer????

staccato2.jpg
 

AlbertaClipper

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 19, 2011
557
20
Ponoka, Alberta
I'm trying to figure out the "drug coated substrate" thingy inside the contraption. It doesn't seem to me like a solid source of nicotine would be as additive free as a liquid would be. It certainly would be proprietary so that you couldn't put juice into it.

That said....thanks for bringing this to our attention!!!

staccato.jpg
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Remember that the key difference between a drug and something else is "intended use." Cheerios when advertised as food can't be regulated under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (FDCA). The same product, if sold as a treatment for cardiovascular disease would need to undergo the drug approval process and approved by the FDA.

This is essentially what the Federal court system has told the FDA regarding regulation of e-cigarettes. If the products are sold with no claims that they can prevent, treat, or mitigate a disease, FDA can only regulate them under the Tobacco Act. If intended to treat the disease of "smoking" (a disease made up by the FDA -- it is not found in any diagnostic manual), then the FDA can regulate the exact same product under the FDCA. The drug version would have to be given a different name to avoid confusion.

Another example of this is the B vitamin Niacin. On pharma company tested it as cholesterol-lowering medication and it has been approved for sale as such under the brand name Niaspan. The vitamin, with the exact same dosage and timed release remains on the market as a supplement. Of course the price is a tad different for the two versions....
 

N2rock

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 29, 2011
561
279
60
Sugar Land, TX
Watch out folks- this thing likely to spell the end of e-cigs. There is big money floating around this thing. With big money comes lobbiests and gov't involvement to make sure there is no cheap alternatives:

According to the terms of the agreement, Cypress will pay Alexza an upfront payment of $5 million to acquire the worldwide license for the Staccato nicotine technology. In addition, following the completion of certain clinical milestones relating to the Staccato nicotine technology, Cypress will be obligated to pay to Alexza an additional technology transfer payment of $1 million. Alexza will have a carried interest of 10% (subject to adjustment in certain circumstances) in the net proceeds of any sale or license by Cypress of the Staccato nicotine assets and the carried interest will be subject to put and call rights in certain circumstances.
 

ckc

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 3, 2009
888
107
UK

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
This is NOT going to replace e-cigarettes. It may replace the Nicotrol Inhaler, though.

E-cigarettes are NOT an alternative for nicotine addiction treatments like gums and patches, they are an alternative for cigarettes like snus or Orbs. Do not forget that!!

Intended use matters, like Elaine said. If this product is seeking FDA approval as an NRT, then it is NOT intended to be a smokeless tobacco product like e-cigarettes. Its ultimate goal will have to be to wean the user off of nicotine, not be a long-term source of nicotine.

This thing to e-cigarettes is like comparing insulin to sugar-free ice cream for diabetics. One treats a disease, the other is a reduced harm alternative for people with the disease. Very different intended uses!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread