Article: "Harms of e-cigs re overstated relative to potential benefits..."

Status
Not open for further replies.

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,283
7,704
Green Lane, Pa
Don't forget that peanut butter, shrimp, eggs, milk and soy can be deadly without any contaminants at all, too. They claim food allergies kill up to 200 people in the U.S. every year. (Of course, lawn mowing kills even more people than food allergies.)

One of the benefits of becoming involved with E Cigs and snus for over three years is better understanding the principle of harm reduction. I've adopted that concept to lawn mowing. That's why mine looks more like a pasture than a lawn right now. However, I think I may risk hopping on the mower tomorrow.
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
Wagener et al. REPLY to comments on the Wagener et al. 2012 discussion paper published (free access):
LET'S KEEP OUR 'EYE ON THE BALL': REDUCING tobacco-RELATED HARM - WAGENER - 2012 - Addiction - Wiley Online Library

Unfortunately, they once again call for FDA regulation of e-cigarettes as tobacco products, which if done via the "deeming" regulation in the FSPTCA (that FDA has stated its intent to propose) would ban the sale of nearly all e-cigarette products, and would otherwise decimate the industry.

Don't know why Siegel signed on to that article and followup letter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread