Right, now your being logical and spreading your wealth of experience and knowledge.Some great points there!
But I think that there are circumstances where one can say that one battery is safer than another. Not safe, just safer.
In my opinion. IMR and INR batteries are safer than ICR/LiPo. The temperature threshold where IMR/INR goes into thermal runaway is higher than ICR/LiPo. And the temperature of the reaction, if IMR/INR does go into runaway, is a lot lower. This means a very low chance of igniting stuff in the battery and reduces the violence of the runaway. ICR batteries in runaway often ignite the solvent in the electrolyte and the higher reaction temperature raises the internal pressure faster. This can result in a more powerful bursting of the battery, flames, and greater chance of other things being ignited or damaged, including a nearby battery.
I would also argue that a battery that runs at a lower temperature than others is safer. If vaping at 100W, single battery, the temperature of an HB6 can go as high as about 75°C externally. But a VTC4 can rise to as high as about 100°C externally at this power level. This is significantly closer to the temperature where the battery can vent as certain additional exothermic reactions start revving up at about 80°C. Things start melting internally at about 120°C-130°C and the internal temperature is higher than the external temperature. This can lead to internal short circuiting and thermal runaway.
Is an HB6 inherently safer than a VTC4? No.
But it can be safer in an application where its lower operating temperature reduces the risk of something bad happening.
However unless each battery is taken to the shop and tested, considering the massive amount of scamming going on there's literally no way of telling, no? Sure , trusted is subjective. At the same time trust is abused as a ritual on a daily basis.
So the point might be, the general consensus of what is good, trusted, combined with your expertise.