Better kr808 cartomizers?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Turkish

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 14, 2011
123
3
New York
Hey all, it's been a while. Going on strong without a regular cigarette since Valentine's Day (2011), and I'm quite happy about it, really. I do have some questions though about these cartomizers, though.

I've found my Riva 510 w/LED with its adapter to kr808s to be very comfortable and easy for me, and these batteries really do go a long way (thanks, Drew!). But seriously, is there anything better than poly-fill cartomizers at this point (I've been using bloog blank cartomizers)? I want to stay with the kr808 system via the Riva (or PigCig, I've been thinking about getting lately), but these carts that use the poly batting are getting annoying both in taste and use. Anyone have any alternatives?

Any opinions on this: GotVapes FLüXomizer™ CE2-X CLEAR KR808 XL 1.8ml 2.6-2.8ohm [gotvapes-clr808XL2.6-ce2x] - $11.95 : GotVapes.com, E-cigarette Supplies - Atomizers Cartomizers Mods Juice and more

Thanks for reading. Cheers
 

Dudeman

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 28, 2009
1,430
1,208
56
New Bedford, MA
IMHO the CE2 cartomizers (Fluxo's, Clearo's, etc.) are a major improvement over poly-fil carto's as far as flavor and vapor production go. Even the 3.0-3.2ohm rated CE2's on standard batteries produce as much if not more vapor than a LR atty. They also last a lot longer than a standard carto and are super easy to clean.

That said, filling them can be a pain. They go through a ton more juice. They aren't very consistant as far as wicking goes, so some of them you have to tip and turn to get liquid to the coil. The clear CE2's are not very pocket friendly as the tubes can be pulled right off. The steel version does not have that problem but you can't see the juice level.

The "tank mods" for CE2's work even better and can hold a full day's supply of juice.

I haven't tried the newer G4 or "vortex" bottom coil cartos yet but they seem to have the same mixed reviews as the CE2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread