Boxer mod

Status
Not open for further replies.

GeorgeS

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
  • May 31, 2015
    2,266
    3,534
    Oregon, USA
    Humm.... which is better: DNA200 or 350J? Are you trolling for a war? (there are fanboys of both chips)

    (disclaimer: I have the 350J version)

    It is my understanding that both devices are VW/TC.
    • The DNA200 model uses a internal Lipo battery, can be attached to a computer and all sorts of data gotten from the mod as well as you can customize just about everything. A handful or more of custom wire 'profiles' can be created on the computer and saved to the device. Some of the settings are only accessable with the computer. Can be USB charged. 200W maximum output. Some users recommend hooking it to a computer before use as some of the default settings may not work well depending on what 'topper' and build you have attached.
    • The 350J model uses two removable 18650's, any attachment to a computer is for software updates only. Currently there are only 3 wire profiles available: Ni, Ti and custom. All the settings can be changed via menu on the device. 150W maximum output.
     

    TKS

    Super Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Apr 28, 2015
    378
    280
    36
    If you don't need more than 133 Watts, go for the dual battery boxer. The DNA200 is simply far ahead of the 350J in terms of feature set. Makes no sense not to get it if it is an option. Also temp control is more accurate and doesn't use PWM. The reason the accuracy is so good is once you have a proper TCR curve, its nearly dead on. The 350J now supports something similar, but only if the curve is linear (thus less accurate for instance when you breach 450+ degrees with titanium).
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread