CASAA Press Release Sent Out on NYS Bills to Ban

Status
Not open for further replies.

yvilla

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 18, 2008
2,063
575
Rochester, NY
For Immediate Release

Smoke-Free Advocates Urge NY Legislature to Keep Electronic Cigarette Sales Legal

A nationwide group of smokers who switched to smokefree tobacco/nicotine alternatives has urged New York lawmakers to reject legislation that would ban the sale of electronic cigarettes in the state. Sales of electronic cigarettes (AKA e-cigarettes or nicotine vaporizers) have skyrocketed in the past two years, with an estimated 300,000 - 500,000 cigarette smokers in the US (including tens of thousands in NY) switching to the novel products that look and feel like a cigarette, but emit no harmful smoke.

In letters sent to the NYS Assembly and Senate Health Committee, the Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives (http://www.casaa.org/) denounced the legislation (A9529 & S7234) because it would harm or kill electronic cigarette consumers in New York who go back to smoking cigarettes, and would create a black market for e-cigarettes that would be difficult and costly to enforce.

CASAA's legal director Yolanda Villa, who lives in Rochester, NY, said "This legislation would deny New Yorkers legal access to smokefree alternatives that have helped me and hundreds of thousands of other long-term adult smokers quit smoking, while deadly combustible cigarettes remain freely and legally available throughout the state." "It's outrageous that some lawmakers believe our health and lives are expendable," added Villa.

Electronic cigarettes are nicotine vaporizers that, when inhaled, emit a tiny amount of nicotine and propylene glycol, in a harmless vapor resembling smoke.

CASAA's medical director Theresa Whitt, MD, said "Nicotine vaporizers don't emit any smoke, which is what causes 99% of tobacco related disease and deaths. There is no evidence that anyone has ever been harmed by these smokefree alternatives, and they are clearly far less hazardous than smoking cigarettes." Dr. Whitt also quit smoking by switching to e-cigarettes.

The group's letter urged lawmakers to amend the legislation to only ban e-cigarette sales to minors. "Although there is no evidence that e-cigarettes are marketed to youth, we support banning their sales to minors just like all other tobacco products," added Dr. Whitt.

CASAA was created last year by smokefree tobacco/nicotine consumers concerned about false allegations made by drug company funded anti-tobacco groups that seek to ban e-cigarettes, and that provide lawmakers with misinformation about the products in their attempts to do so.
 

yvilla

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 18, 2008
2,063
575
Rochester, NY
This is the letter that went out (but on CASAA letterhead and signed by six board members), to the Senate Health Committee members (individually named, of course), and to all Assemblymembers:

The Honorable Thomas K. Duane
Chair, Senate Health Committee
430 State Capitol Building
Albany, NY 12247

Re: S7234 - Currently pending before Senate Health Committee

Dear Senator Duane:

The Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association (CASAA) is shocked to learn that recently introduced legislation (A9529 & S7234) has been quickly advancing through the NY Legislature that would harm or kill many of our members by either forcing us to go back to smoking cigarettes, or requiring us to travel to other states and/or to purchase nicotine vaporizers (AKA electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes) from a newly created black market throughout New York. We implore you to oppose and/or quickly amend this inhumane legislation that protects combustible cigarettes and threatens the health of ex-smokers and smokers alike.

CASAA is a nationwide non-profit organization created last year by hundreds of e-cigarette consumers who recently quit smoking or sharply reduced cigarette consumption by switching to these life saving products. Our association (comprised solely of concerned volunteers) works to educate the public about these products, and to protect the rights of our members and of smokers who want to switch to significantly less hazardous smokefree tobacco/nicotine alternatives.

In the past two years, several hundred thousand smokers in the US have switched to nicotine vaporizers, and virtually all have experienced significant improvements in breathing, taste, smell and overall health. Unlike traditional cigarettes, nicotine vaporizers don't burn tobacco and don't emit any smoke. Instead, these novel products emit a tiny amount of nicotine and propylene glycol vapor, which has been used for decades in air purifiers, asthma inhalers and other medications, and (in far greater amounts) theatrical fog, and is considered safe by the FDA and EPA.

Increasingly more public health experts and anti smoking advocates agree that nicotine vaporizers are far less hazardous alternatives to cigarette smoking and pose no known harm to users or nonusers, including the American Association of Public Health Physicians (AAPHP), the American Council on Science and Health, and Smokefree Pennsylvania. CASAA strongly supports the AAPHP's two recently filed petitions to the FDA to classify and regulate e-cigarettes as tobacco products, and to truthfully inform
smokers that these products are far less hazardous alternatives to cigarettes. http://www.regulations.gov/search/Re...DA-2010-P-0095
http://www.regulations.gov/search/Re...DA-2010-P-0093

A key reason CASAA was created was in response to false accusations about e-cigarettes (and calls for their ban) by some abstinence-only tobacco prohibitionists who are heavily funded by drug companies that market nicotine gums/lozenges/patches and other smoking cessation drugs, which most CASAA members already tried using in unsuccessful quit smoking attempts. But nicotine vaporizers are marketed as alternatives to traditional cigarettes, not as smoking cessation aids. In January, Federal Judge Richard Leon agreed in a sharply worded ruling, stating the FDA can only regulate e-cigarettes as tobacco products, in SE v FDA, a case in which CASAA members along with other consumers submitted an Amicus Curiae brief.

Since nicotine vaporizers pose potentially devastating market competition to traditional combustible cigarettes (as virtually all e-cigarette consumers used to buy and smoke traditional cigarettes), the chief beneficiary of A9529 & S7234 would be cigarettes, while the legislation threatens the health of smokers, ex-smokers and those who will continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke. Ironically, we aren't aware that any tobacco company is lobbying to ban e-cigarettes, just drug industry funded groups.

A9529 & S7234 also would impose additional (and totally unnecessary) costs on state and local taxpayers for enforcement and adjudication, and would further burden already overwhelmed police departments and courts in New York.

While CASAA adamantly opposes banning the sale of e-cigarettes to adult smokers, we would support the provision in A9529 & S7234 that would ban their sale to minors. Although there is no evidence that any minor uses e-cigarettes or that any e-cigarette supplier markets to minors, CASAA urges you to support amending A9529 & S7234 to ban e-cigarette sales to "minors" (but not adults), as occurs with all other tobacco products.

Thank you for your attention and consideration.

Enc: Electronic Cigarette Fact Sheet
 

Webby

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Mar 31, 2009
796
15
USA
Excellent work! Thank God for CASAA! I am in the Rochester area yvilla, I work for a local copier/printer company(bet you cant guess which one lol), if you need any assistance let me know.

Actually, reproduction of campaign materials helps the cause tremendously! PM me (or any CASAA board member) if you might be able to hlp with print costs!
 

Webby

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Mar 31, 2009
796
15
USA
Thanks Y'villa -

The legal, medical and everyman's angle that the CASAA members provide gives depth and credability no one e-cig user could muster. We truly stand to accomplish more in numbers (and those willing to stand up) than a million letters.

FWIW - I am proud to have you (and the rest of the CASAA Board) representing the effort.

Pt. Pleasant, A Quaint Drinking village with a fishing problem

ROFL - been there - Freehold, NJ native. Great town, never heard it put quite that way. ;)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread