CASAA Suggestion Box

Status
Not open for further replies.

Territoo

Diva
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
  • Jul 17, 2009
    7,693
    37,930
    Texas
    Webby is right in that we need to and will be establishing GAP. We cannot at this stage necessarily promise you that we will include a discount on zero nic juice though, at least without researching the matter.

    I suspect that it might be that the biggest cost of the juice is the labor to measure, mix, bottle, label, and store the juice. This would be similar to fast food restaurants, which is why they can supersize the meals so cheaply. The food cost is much smaller than the labor.

    We will look into the matter though.
     

    68stang

    Senior Member
    ECF Veteran
    Dec 19, 2009
    289
    5
    USA
    Well getting to something simpler, but really representing of what a serious
    consumer rights group should do.

    How about a CASAA-level demand for a fixed discount on all suppliers 0 mg e-juice, this will :
    1. be fair since the most expensive part of e-juice is nicotine
    2. advocate an image of less harm possible, giving an extra reason for ppl
    to wean off nicotine.
    3. give ppl a simple goal to 'fight' for or to join CASAA, aka 'advertise' CASAA
    as something fundamentally different to ECA ... we are the consumers
    afterall

    slow down! Casaa or any body meddling in the free market is for Russia not the USA. If a supplier is able to discount there 0 nic juice andm ake money and earn new customers then they will soon enough. Remember the free market is the best and only way to go.
     

    thanas1s

    Full Member
    ECF Veteran
    Jul 18, 2009
    28
    0
    greece
    well tbh i don't see why and how a consumer group demand for a cheaper product or industry-wide adopted practices is something that goes against free market concept*.

    Quite the contrary actually, free market prices are not just defined by competition between suppliers and the various costs involved but it is affected by the pricing point that consumers generally accept as fair.
    The overall pricing of most things related to e-cigs is too high imo and that is because consumers are more willing to pay that much due to the hugely tax-inflated prices of the analog alternatives. You need a simple PG per galon, VG per galon, flavours per ml, other food additives cost calculation to see just how much overpriced this product is.

    That being said, i am not the one to say that juice suppliers are scamming us out of our money or something, but from the point of CASAA view i thing that we have to demand smaller prices and never settle down on quality - prices issues.

    Anyways, back to the issue at hand, since non-nic juice has a smaller mixing labour cost, one has not to worry that he will ship 24mg juice instead of the ordered 6mg (!) the overall supplier cost should be lower. Just guessing ...

    *unless your hero is called Adam Smith and Microsoft is a company that adheres to the free market competition .. !
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread