Class Action Suit against SE:
- Thread starter ladyraj
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Yes, you have to opt out by following the instructions to the letter. In my past I have been involved in three class action suits. One of which I did opt out of. The other two I did not.
Yes, I got a check after a few years. One check was for .68 cents and I think my big one was for $1.49 or around that.
The lawyers are ALWAYS the big winners in Class Action suits.
Yes, I got a check after a few years. One check was for .68 cents and I think my big one was for $1.49 or around that.
The lawyers are ALWAYS the big winners in Class Action suits.
Jim you need to go duck your head under your kitchen faucet real quick like. LOL!
I lived in 3 states for the duration of one class action suit, never filed a change of address with the court, and the settlement funds still made it to me after 7 years. The powers that be evidently have ways of finding you via the post office if you make their original list.
No one knows how deep this thing will go. Bryn Garrett merely has to show a receipt for the purchase of a product that is advertised and sold Nationwide. The accounting of all things SE could become a product of discovery or a giant fishing expedition. Cast the net wide...draw in more fish. 8-o
Class actions in general are just legal scams. Granted, there are always good lawsuits out there but in general it's the lawyers that make tons of money, and the consumer that was wronged gets a $10.00 coupon in the mail...
IMHO, first this jerk has to prove that he bought an SE product, then there has to be proof that one of thier carts actually had diethylene in it, and number three, what is his complaint based on? Does his carts contain diethylene, did he get sick? I think this is just frivalous bull**** and should not make it into a court of law to begin with.
BigJim, you really are a man after my own heart. I love it when you're mad
BigJim, you really are a man after my own heart. I love it when you're mad
I think we need to file class action suit against FDA for damages that would be caused if we have to switch back to analogs.
If no one has had a reaction or illness from the electronic cigarette how can they file a class action suit.
If no one has had a reaction or illness from the electronic cigarette how can they file a class action suit.
Frankly, I believe this is an idea worth investigating with serious deliberation. And such would involve a significant amount of work...to be sure.
But it seems to me there might possibly be substantive grounds for valid cause which may either currently exist (but haven't yet been adequately identified)... or which may emerge in direct consequence of some action(s) taken by the FDA at any point in the future.
Anyone else have any further thoughts along this line?
My son is an attorney. He now runs his own insurance and collection agency but I can certainly discuss this possibility with him.
He is so proud that I quit smoking and my house smells so much better. Although when I first starting vaping he was a bit concerned about ecigs but decided it had to be better than smoking cigarettes.
He is so proud that I quit smoking and my house smells so much better. Although when I first starting vaping he was a bit concerned about ecigs but decided it had to be better than smoking cigarettes.
I worry that so many people were disappointed in SE's product that they will just join the suit in hopes of getting some of their money back and won't realize the impact this could have on the future of PVs.
Catwoman, the defendent does not have to prove his personal cartridges had these "carcinogens" in them....the FDA already provided the "proof" of a probable lack of quality control in their analysis. More importantly, the FDA report disproves the baseline stance of the health claims made by SE advertising/marketing campaigns. SE specifically stated and sold the products as free of cancer causing agents.
While NRT has the same carcinogens, those products do not state they contain no carcinogens.8-o
While NRT has the same carcinogens, those products do not state they contain no carcinogens.8-o
The FDA can not be held accountable for doing their job despite how politically driven it may have been interpreted. One would be hard pressed to demonstrate the removal of the PV and eliquids drove users to tobacco if vaping is not really smoking. It's an oft-quoted stance but more indicative of an addiction needing treatment versus a valid legal argument. All those quit banners that permeate the board demonstrate that vapors are not smokers...thus where is the harm if the cycle of smoking is already broken? Returning to tobacco will be viewed as a choice.
I'm just saying....
Don't hate the messenger...
That's right. Hate the FDA instead. It's their corruption and greed that's the cause of all this.
Considering the fact the FDA just started collecting their "user fees" from the tobacco companies I think we know where the loyalties lie:
FDA starts collecting tobacco fees | Richmond Times-Dispatch
FDA starts collecting tobacco fees | Richmond Times-Dispatch
i liked it better when i could close my eyes and if i concentrated hard enough i could pretend the the FDA gave a rats ... about me and not its budget..... i think that fantasy world is gone for good now... sick maligned .......s
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
