Dear Rolygate ...

Status
Not open for further replies.

nicotime

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 22, 2009
1,951
862
Montoursville, PA
JerryRMavatar.gif


LMAO....Heyyyy...I thought this was a family oriented forum!:nun:

Nice skimpies Jerry!:thumbs:
 

MastiffMike

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 9, 2009
5,744
7,751
Dogville Estate
Mike, I think we need to get the other members to show their support for you. Therefore I am proposing that everyone on the ECF, add a tongue and the words "Save the Tongue !!" to their avatar ! :D:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

Roly added support in his sig. Now if we can get SJ to join us we just might, all together, be able to overthrow the beef boy! :D
 

omgitsthr33

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 30, 2010
147
0
NC
While the new rule that :nah: ani-:pervy::lol::hubba::rolleyes:-ed signatures is :thumbs: with :nun::nun: no doubt there are :evil: :evil:who will :-x because they :wub: sites that resemble children's party sites :pop::shock::pop: !!!
Since ... "The single biggest complaint about websites in some surveys is flashing gfx. They aggravate a large number of people." ... is there a chance that we could do away with this junk :w00t: too?

We could just do away with people who make posts like that. LOL j/k ;)
 

JerryRM

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Nov 10, 2009
18,018
69,879
Rhode Island

Not appreciated.


Spence, I believe that omgitsthr33, was just joking, "LOL j/k ;)".
 

taukimada

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 23, 2009
1,467
29
56
Tullahoma, Tn
www.youtube.com
@Spence
OK. But it doesn't seem practical to ask Angus to censor smilies on some form of acceptability rating. I think we just have to put up with them, love 'em or hate 'em, and if somebody uses ones you don't like, well, just skim past their post. The fact is, there are far more requests to use them, and to have more of them available, than there are to chop them. Post content is a matter of taste in several ways, so we either stop at and read a post or pass over it.

Somehow a balance has to be struck between what the majority want and whether that is a good thing or not. In this case I think it's about right. Animated sig gfx is going too far though, they swiftly become a problem.

@Spaky
Exactly. Nobody likes rules including us because we have to do all the work needed to bring them in, then we get all the flak for being heavy-handed.

So in general we don't have a rule until a point has been passed where it is needed. Flashing sigs are a major pain and not wanted, they were absent from here for a long time but when they arrived we had to act. Offensive vids started to become a problem so had to be looked at. At the same time, video spamming became popular - since text link spam is easily stopped, the spammers started putting their links in vids instead. So some form of control of vid content was needed.

There's always something...

___________________________________________

rolytongue.jpg

heavy handed???

spock_slap.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread