differences in 510 atty/carto flavors

[KrazyIvan]

'sup guys.

I have a basic 510 kit and a 510 direct passthrough, I have found that some flavors taste wayyy better in the atty and some are tasting weak or don't taste like anything at all in the cartomizer/PT..

If put an atty on the PT, it provides good TH but demolishes the flavor (on a powered USB hub of course).. with a carto on it seems all the flavors I have taste fine.

Now in hindsight with the batteries, its pretty much the other way around, everything tastes alright with attys on the batteries but the cartomizers some liquids give me a weird chemical-ly like burning sensation like I just got done vaping Drain-O or something.

I don't know if its just me being flavor subjective or being picky but I understand the flavors changing on higher voltages but why would they change from cartomizer to atomizer, can anyone explain? lol

I find it really weird.

 

[TWolf]

Hummm... Good question. Can't really help since I don't use cartos. Taste can be extremely subjective though and can change drastically over time when you've quit analogs. Some things you dislike now may turn out to be your favs later.

 

[CaptJay]

What kind of PT is it? A reg 3.7v inline or a no inline battery 5v?
I founda difference btw between reg 510 batts and both types of PT its probably to do with output power - the reg 510 batts only reach 3.1 or so and obviously the 5v is higher and Im fairly sure the 3.7PT is higher too just a little because I had a warmer more robust flavor from my Pt than my reg 510.
As for cartos - I found a lot of them gave me a horrible taste - and a couple were OK but the TH i got off them was HUGE (way too much for me lol). I went back to dripping on my beloved atties lol.