WHAT! You are ABSOLUTELY wrong!
I agree that a syringe is not a graduated cylinder, but if you use the syringe as I have indicated and stop at the Zero mark, it is IN FACT, a graduated cylinder.
We really are being picking some major nits here, but I contend, that if you use your syringe in the manner indicated, that all the fluid that is between your measure mark and the zero mark is the amount of fluid you desire. You could use a 3 foot needle that is 10 guage and still wind up with the desired amount. Arguing about the amount of fluid in the needle may seem nitpicky, but it is a significant amount if you are making a small batch.
I can't think of a MORE accurate method of measuring small amounts of liquid. We don't have 1 ml or 3 ml graduated cylinders. We have to turn a syringe into one, which we have done using my method.
You can't even use a syringe without a needle and be more accurate, because of the fluid between the bottom of the syringe and the zero mark.
I hope everyone has managed to read through this lengthy debate, but I feel that using this meniscus method is a significant improvement in precise measurements, and repeatable recipes, in any quantity.
Using the meniscus with air above it to measure in a syringe is just wrong. It may be easier for you to get reproducible results; it is the right method for graduated cylinders, beakers, flasks and the like (which are calibrated to use the meniscus, and calibrated to the meniscus of a specific liquid). But that's not how a syringe works. Using that method, the actual volume of liquid would change depending on the needle attached. That is there is fluid in the needle and the bit that screws to the syringe and there is fluid in the body of the syringe. If you use a bigger or longer needle then there will be more fluid if you just measure by meniscus.
Of Course! But when you are injecting the fluid into your mixture, you stop when the meniscus is at the ZERO mark on the syringe. You don't inject the fluid that is in the needle and below the ZERO mark into your mixture. You put that fluid back into your bottle.
What you do is this (for say 1ml):
draw in 1ml of air into syringe.
insert syringe into bottle and hold upside down.
inject air into bottle.
We don't have this situation. We are't using a sealed bottle! This isn't a medical vial! How can we hold the bottle upside down?
draw .5ml of fluid. There will be a small air buble at the needle end of the syringe, this is the air that was in the needle tip part. inject this back into the bottle. let's say push .25ml or so + the air back in the bottle.
draw fluid down to 1ml mark. You now have 1ml of fluid in the body of the syringe, and a needle full of fluid, and no air bubbles anywhere.
remove and inject into wherever.
there will still be fluid in the needle bit, that is waste and you just pump it out into a vaper towel or something.
If you measure by meniscus with an air buble between the liquid and the plunger, you'll end up with the liquid in the syringe (1ml) PLUS whatever liquid it takes to fill the needle part. If you change needle tips to a longer or larger bore needle and keep using the meniscus method you'll end up with two different amounts of liquid because there will be more in the needle part.
If you instead do it properly, you'll end up with the same amount of liquid no matter which tip you use. You could have a 3 foot long 1/8" needle and still get the same amount of liquid.
I agree, but your analysis just doesn't fit the DIY situation.
Yes I know I'm being nitpicky and at the scale of things we're measuring something like being off by 0.05ml isn't going to be much of a difference. If you use the same syringe and same needle all the time, the meniscus method will give you the same amount of liquid each time, but it's won't be what you were trying to measure on the scale. Syringes are not closed bottomed cylinders and aren't designed to be read the same way.
I agree that a syringe is not a graduated cylinder, but if you use the syringe as I have indicated and stop at the Zero mark, it is IN FACT, a graduated cylinder.
We really are being picking some major nits here, but I contend, that if you use your syringe in the manner indicated, that all the fluid that is between your measure mark and the zero mark is the amount of fluid you desire. You could use a 3 foot needle that is 10 guage and still wind up with the desired amount. Arguing about the amount of fluid in the needle may seem nitpicky, but it is a significant amount if you are making a small batch.
I can't think of a MORE accurate method of measuring small amounts of liquid. We don't have 1 ml or 3 ml graduated cylinders. We have to turn a syringe into one, which we have done using my method.
You can't even use a syringe without a needle and be more accurate, because of the fluid between the bottom of the syringe and the zero mark.
I hope everyone has managed to read through this lengthy debate, but I feel that using this meniscus method is a significant improvement in precise measurements, and repeatable recipes, in any quantity.
Last edited: