DNA 200 Watt

Status
Not open for further replies.

USMCotaku

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Apr 25, 2014
11,877
45,735
California
I hear that. Still using an ipv2s. Wish I had the income for some of these mods. Been wanting more that 70w for a while now not to mention tc.
I was lucky enough to win my tc mods, otherwise I'd still be using my zna50 clone and ipv mini. I do have a variant clone for high powered vaping (still paying it off :p), but it rarely gets used, I usually prefer a good tank
 

TheotherSteveS

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2015
5,232
6,814
Birmingham, England
I have a question for the beta testers. I don't care about 200w and what not, if I get a dna200 I'll limit it to 40 or 50w anyway through the software. The main reason I'm keen on it is the use of lipo so I get more vape time at lower wattages.

My question is, does the TC work better than in the dna40? I loved my SX Mini M but sold it cause it was too big for me, this is the biggest selling point for me, absolutely top notch TC.

Im going to sit back, grab some popcorn and watch this...;)
 

Mad Scientist

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 11, 2013
1,359
2,052
Smokestack, PA, USA
I have a question for the beta testers. I don't care about 200w and what not, if I get a dna200 I'll limit it to 40 or 50w anyway through the software. The main reason I'm keen on it is the use of lipo so I get more vape time at lower wattages.

My question is, does the TC work better than in the dna40? I loved my SX Mini M but sold it cause it was too big for me, this is the biggest selling point for me, absolutely top notch TC.

I'm not a beta tester but if you can be more specific as to what absolutely top notch TC means to you, someone will likely be able to answer with whether it does or doesn't do whatever it is you expect from it.

I'm happy with DNA 40 TC and I prefer the evolv user interface so what evolv already has out there is top notch TC to me. :)

I'm interested in the DNA 200 for, yeah the additional power available, but also its connectivity features on a computer. I've already devised a set of experiments to test its TC accuracy, not because I care about its accuracy but more because I enjoy the experiments lol. I'll post the results when I can get my hands on a DNA 200 board and get it working.
 
Last edited:

Mad Scientist

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 11, 2013
1,359
2,052
Smokestack, PA, USA
I mean in terms of accuracy and reliability. I've used a DNA40 (not owned) and sometimes it did have a few issues since the TC detection was automatic. On the SX350J you set it manually and it worked brilliantly. That's pretty much all I'm asking :)

The most recent DNA 40 has a resistance lock feature. Using that feature makes the user interface similar to the SX350J for setting resistance. I really prefer the evolv refinement capability and almost always forget to set the resistance on the SX350J after changing attys, so that says which one I like better. I don't know if the DNA 200 works differently.

For accuracy, no present TC is really "accurate" but they do offer repeatability. Once you figure out what temp setting works best for you on a particular atty and build, it will pretty much always work the same at that temp setting forever after.
 

suspectK

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2013
4,573
2,893
Alabummer
I just want to confirm whether the DNA 200 allows one to manually select temperature control or normal power mode. The answer may be available but I've missed it.

Duane
Yes, it does allow direct power for kanthal use. It also offers user controlled settings for temp protection with different wire than nickel.. I would assume it would also have a resistance lock feature, but I'm like most of us in here on this subject...

Edit- I misread your post...forgot about all the PC programmable bs..
 

KTMRider

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 5, 2014
4,538
18,079
NJ
I've already devised a set of experiments to test its TC accuracy, not because I care about its accuracy but more because I enjoy the experiments lol. I'll post the results when I can get my hands on a DNA 200 board and get it working.
Hence the forum name :p

I mean in terms of accuracy and reliability. I've used a DNA40 (not owned) and sometimes it did have a few issues since the TC detection was automatic. On the SX350J you set it manually and it worked brilliantly. That's pretty much all I'm asking :)
I own both (6 DNA40, 2 SX350j). Granted, I have only a week with the SX350j, I think the DNA40 is a better chip. Some will see this as fanboyism but from my observations and knowing how each chip works, that's my conclusion so far. How much better? Not much. The DNA40 seems to be made by engineers for engineers. The SX350j seems to be made by engineers for consumers. If you look at each chip as an engineer or even a tech geek, you can really appreciate how the DNA40 works over the SX350j. The problem is that in the real world, there are too many variables that can't be controlled by the chip so neither will shine for everyone.

My oldest DNA40 is 8 months old and used just about every day since I got it. Never had an issue with it. If you have a solid atomizer and build, TP and refinement is pretty amazing. I have the newer DNA40's with atty lock and never use it. It's a band-aid for a bad atomizer or build or even a badly wired mod.

I just want to confirm whether the DNA 200 allows one to manually select temperature control or normal power mode. The answer may be available but I've missed it.

Duane
If it's anything like the DNA40, yes. You go into temp adjustment and scroll up until you see off. I've had no issues using a kanthal build in temp mode though. It just works like non-TP mode.
 

druckle

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 20, 2013
1,149
2,193
Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
Hence the forum name :p


I own both (6 DNA40, 2 SX350j). Granted, I have only a week with the SX350j, I think the DNA40 is a better chip. Some will see this as fanboyism but from my observations and knowing how each chip works, that's my conclusion so far. How much better? Not much. The DNA40 seems to be made by engineers for engineers. The SX350j seems to be made by engineers for consumers. If you look at each chip as an engineer or even a tech geek, you can really appreciate how the DNA40 works over the SX350j. The problem is that in the real world, there are too many variables that can't be controlled by the chip so neither will shine for everyone.

My oldest DNA40 is 8 months old and used just about every day since I got it. Never had an issue with it. If you have a solid atomizer and build, TP and refinement is pretty amazing. I have the newer DNA40's with atty lock and never use it. It's a band-aid for a bad atomizer or build or even a badly wired mod.


If it's anything like the DNA40, yes. You go into temp adjustment and scroll up until you see off. I've had no issues using a kanthal build in temp mode though. It just works like non-TP mode.
I guess I should have asked my question in a more clear manner. What I'm really interested in is being able to lock in the Temp Control mode so that I don't have the potential for the device to revert to power mode by autosensing.

One of the difficulties I've had with DNA 40 is that it seems to pop out of TC mode particularly at higher resistances as one might choose to use with Titanium wire.

Duane
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread