DNA20 vs DNA30

[AnsonJames]

You are entitled to your own opinion - however wrong it is

I don't need to man up about anything mate - I'll take a real Evolv chip over a counterfeit any day because they tend to work in a reliable fashion for longer -but please feel free to kid yourself as much as you like.

For your information, I don't mind clones at all but cloned electronics are a joke.

Don't forget the American designers of the dna - this counterfeit wouldn't exist without them.
It's a real pity that people don't have any consideration for those guys and their buisness when they're saving a few bucks by purchasing sub par knock-offs.

That's my opinion.

 

[AnsonJames]

Oh by the way - here's your similar circuitry;

 

[AnsonJames]

Watch this from the 37 minute mark;

 

[Vlad1]

You are entitled to your own opinion - however wrong it is

I don't need to man up about anything mate - I'll take a real Evolv chip over a counterfeit any day because they tend to work in a reliable fashion for longer -but please feel free to kid yourself as much as you like.

For your information, I don't mind clones at all but cloned electronics are a joke.

Don't forget the American designers of the dna - this counterfeit wouldn't exist without them.
It's a real pity that people don't have any consideration for those guys and their buisness when they're saving a few bucks by purchasing sub par knock-offs.

That's my opinion.

Lol so hard to get through to you... the point I originally replied to was your matter-of-fact statement of "they don't behave in the same way." and obvious comparison of two dissimilar devices which I've stated a couple times now and provided you with the data to substantiate why that statement is wrong.

But yet again your meandering about this time about your preference of real over counterfeit, reliability, durability, last longer, American design & lack of consideration.

One of your previous post was about accuracy, safety, fire, durability, output


I think the disconnect here is what you consider "Behavior" vs what I consider "Behavior" Like I've stated a few times now the average user will not see any significant difference while vaping due to the output the clone provides is very similar to what the Evolv does.

So the question is it the durability, lack of consideration, boards on fire safety etc..etc.... that makes the clone to where "they don't behave in the same way."? Please point me to exactly what specifically it is that makes them behave differently. I've provide you with scope traces and outputs, resistance readings but you just keep going off point and not elaborating on that statement.

 

[Vlad1]

Oh by the way - here's your similar circuitry;

Pretty sure the average user could care less if the board has one IC or one hundred while vaping. And i'm also absolutely positive that the design of the board could be completely different and yet "Behave exactly the same" to the average user provided the input / output specs were the same.

 

[AnsonJames]

Yeah whatever mate.

 

[Vlad1]

Watch this from the 37 minute mark;

I've previously watched both videos. Am I to assume because they make negative comments and claims of the clones I should set aside my scope traces, power measurements a month of all day use and agree with you that "they don't behave in the same way."? I think not. I think I'll go off of my real experience and real data and you can meander about finding links of what someone else has stated then echo that.

I

 

[AnsonJames]

You do that.

 

[dr g]

The two boards may behave superficially in the same way, i.e. they are both boost boards, they are very different in actual operation. But perhaps most importantly for the purposes of the OP, the differences between a DNA20 and a clone chip, and a DNA20 and DNA30 are completely different. So it's irrelevant whether they behave similarly in a given range.

 

[Ed_C]

So, if the board design and function are different, it doesn't seem like much of a clone, Other than they took the name DNA.

 

[dr g]

So, if the board design and function are different, it doesn't seem like much of a clone, Other than they took the name DNA.

This applies to pretty much everything out there called a DNA that isn't an Evolv product.

 

[Ed_C]

This applies to pretty much everything out there called a DNA that isn't an Evolv product.

I agree, same with the Kicks from China that aren't DC-DC, like the ones from Evolv

 

[dr g]

I agree, same with the Kicks from China that aren't DC-DC, like the ones from Evolv

Anything out of China is a different (lower) level of technology as far as I have seen.