Do you think the e-cig industry will be more profitable than the tobacco industry?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'll guarantee that if the tobacco industry gets involved, the prices are going to increase exponentially!

Right now I feel we have it pretty good!

Enjoy it while you can!

I feel that the more that the Government, BT, BP & the FDA are involved the worse it's going to get.

I can't see it getting any better with the amount of money that the Government, BT, BP & the FDA stands to miss out on.

Just don't take away my option to vape!

Speaking of exponential price increases and government involvement, just wait until they start taxing the holy hell out of it.
 

CarolT

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 22, 2011
803
1,439
Madison WI
In light of this, I am of the opinion that the e-cig industry will become quite the profitable venture; so much so that over time, should this industry maintain its growth, the tobacco industry may lose out because of it.

Any thoughts?

Don't you realize that the nicotine comes from tobacco? Including Wisconsin chewing tobacco leaf (Johnson Creek Smoke Juice).
 
Last edited:

CarolT

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 22, 2011
803
1,439
Madison WI
I would have to say that I want Big Tobacco to stay out of my E-Liquid!

Look what they put in Cigarettes!

The anti-smokers deliberately commit scientific fraud to falsely blame tobacco for diseases that are really caused by infection. Smokers and passive smokers - and vapers who were once smokers - are more likely to have been exposed to those infections, for socioeconomic reasons. The anti-smokers' bogus studies are based on lifestyle questionnaires, so they're cynically designed to exploit these class differences. And, the health fascists will use the same scientific fraud to hate-monger against vaping, unless people get wise to it.

And, all their so-called "independent" reports were ring-led by the same guy, Jonathan M. Samet, including the Surgeon General Reports, the EPA report, the IARC report, and the ASHRAE report, and he's now the chairman of the FDA Committee on Tobacco. He and his politically privileged clique exclude all the REAL scientists from their echo chamber. That's how they make their reports "unanimous!"

http://www.smokershistory.com/SGlies.html
 

Firefly13

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
May 24, 2010
1,136
66
Oklahoma, USA
www.blackvelvetjuice.com
Speaking of exponential price increases and government involvement, just wait until they start taxing the holy hell out of it.

That's exactly what will happen, and all these newbie juice vendors popping up every day will have restrictions too, they won't be able to just mix in their kitchen and laugh their way to the bank forever :D
 

CarolT

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 22, 2011
803
1,439
Madison WI
Toacco companies make about 25 cents a pack profit. New York state makes $4.50 a pack. Be careful who you accuse of what.

That's right. And of all those hundreds of billions of dollars they've looted from us, not one cent has ever been used to protect smokers' rights. It goes into the pockets of anti-smokers to spread lies and defamations and pass smoking bans. And they share it with their fellow legislators to use on their own pet projects, in order to buy their support.

For the government to commit fraud to deprive us of our liberties is automatically a violation of our Constitutional rights to the equal protection of the laws, just as much as if it purposely threw innocent people in prison. And for the government to spread lies about phony smoking dangers is terrorism, no different from calling in phony bomb threats.

And, the so-called tobacco lobbyists have been in cahoots with the American Cancer Society from the very beginning. In Wisconsin, they're the most powerful lobby in the state, and cronies of both the Republican and Democratic governors.

http://www.smokershistory.com/tobacco.html
 

OMG!

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2011
375
1,373
I believe that e-cig supplies (excluding the nicotine) will fall under the same category as things that are sold in head shops. That whole "drug delivery device" argument is bogus... a simple piece of rolling paper is a drug delivery device but they can't ban paper.

The only component they can regulate is the actual nicotine. So what if all you can buy is flavorless juice?... as long as there are flavorings people will mix their own.

The govt. is going to have a hard time regulating e-cigs because ingenious people will always find a work-around.
 

kmac

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 29, 2011
128
3
Louisiana
This is the paradox that will probably be bad either way. If a giant like big tobacco or big pharma doesn't get on board with making/selling ecigs or ejuice, there is the risk of them being banned. Too much money flowing to the government. If they've been able to keep cigs on the shelves this long, then they obviously have the ability to dictate gov. policy. And let's not even discuss all the blatant examples of big pharma influencing politicians. At least big tobacco only has one product to kill us quicker.

However, once they get involved, the whole deal will change. All these great small vendors will eventually go by the wayside, regulations and taxes will force the costs to skyrocket. Innovation on new products will slow dramatically, and forget about buying all those great flavors you love now.

And as much as I would love everyone to make the change to ecigs, the other paradox is that, the more popular these get the more likely above scenario is to play out. Once there is a big enough market, I can assure you big tobacco will be licking their chops to get in on it unless they can just get them banned now while it is a relatively miniscule market compared to theirs.

I hope it stays just like it is now. There is a steady stream of new technologies to choose from, and so many reputable vendors to choose from. I just won't be suprised to see the whole thing come crashing down.
 
Last edited:

HoMeGrOwN

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2011
636
235
st louis, mo
www.reverbnation.com
I think that vaping is the future of smoking. I think that at this point it's too fiddly for most smokers to be interested in it and the ones that look like cigarettes don't work well and that's another deterrent. I think once the technology develops units that are easier to use and less fiddly that it will take over the industry and people will be switching left and right. If you still smoke people will look at you like your phone has a cord.

Someday they'll sell the ciggy look-alikes in 10 packs in a pack sized PCC and the cartomizers will last all day for reals... that's all it would take to really take off. And the 10 pack will cost like $30-$40 (less than a carton of smokes anyway), and there will be e-cig stores where you can buy parts/cartos/juice at a 5% discount when you bring in your old parts/cartos.

cant wait for the day i can run up to the corner store and buy some new attys or a 14500 batt. lol
 

Rosa

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Mar 18, 2010
4,947
210
Beaverton, Oregon!
However, once they get involved, the whole deal will change. All these great small vendors will eventually go by the wayside, regulations and taxes will force the costs to skyrocket. Innovation on new products will slow dramatically, and forget about buying all those great flavors you love now.

And as much as I would love everyone to make the change to ecigs, the other paradox is that, the more popular these get the more likely above scenario is to play out. Once there is a big enough market, I can assure you big tobacco will be licking their chops to get in on it unless they can just get them banned now while it is a relatively miniscule market compared to theirs.

I hope it stays just like it is now. There is a steady stream of new technologies to choose from, and so many reputable vendors to choose from. I just won't be suprised to see the whole thing come crashing down.

LOL! Reading this part of your post sounds exactly like the first few years of Personal Computers. Most people never thought they would ever really take off.. after all, at the time all they really did was some minor calculations. It didn't make sense that regular people would end up wanting to buy that technology for their personal use, especially when much of it could be built using parts from radio shack.

Ideas were freely shared and it was mostly just a fun and exciting hobby that was growing pretty quickly. IBM was never really worried about the nerdy guys who were messing around in their garages in Palo Alto with a bunch of electronics part and making "personal computers" LAFF, they said.
 

Ethereal

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 15, 2011
634
288
UK
I haven't had the need to try it (vaping works well for me), but to be clear it's SWEDISH snus that's good, not American snus like the stuff Camel put's out. I think it's supposed to have a dry malty flavor.


Snus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
quote:
"The Swedish government has studied this stuff to death, and to date, there is no compelling evidence that it has any adverse health consequences. ... Whatever they eventually find out, it is dramatically less dangerous than smoking."

"It is hypothesized that the widespread use of snus by Swedish men (estimated at 30% of Swedish male ex-smokers), displacing tobacco smoking and other varieties of snuff, is responsible for the incidence of tobacco-related mortality in men being significantly lower in Sweden than any other European country; in contrast, since women traditionally are less likely to use snus, their rate of tobacco-related deaths in Sweden can be compared to that of other European countries."

It's a grainy type of tobacco that they roll up and stick under the top lip, makes them look like they got hit in the mouth. Prolonged use can rot a hole through the lip into the nasal cavity. Not a great product. I lived in Norway for 6 years and tried it. You get a good nicotine buzz but I would suggest trying the snus that comes in little T bags so you don't get it all in your mouth when you first try it.
 
Last edited:

kmac

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 29, 2011
128
3
Louisiana
LOL! Reading this part of your post sounds exactly like the first few years of Personal Computers. Most people never thought they would ever really take off.. after all, at the time all they really did was some minor calculations. It didn't make sense that regular people would end up wanting to buy that technology for their personal use, especially when much of it could be built using parts from radio shack.

Ideas were freely shared and it was mostly just a fun and exciting hobby that was growing pretty quickly. IBM was never really worried about the nerdy guys who were messing around in their garages in Palo Alto with a bunch of electronics part and making "personal computers" LAFF, they said.

Yeah but PCs were never under fire from the FDA, and there was never a concerted effort on the part of the government to ban computers. Just sayin. All it would take is a court to label these "drug delivery devices" and next thing you know only pharmaceutical companies can make them.

But, I hope you're right. I'll try to be more optimistic :)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread