My mom sent me an email with this article:
doctortipster.
com/24213-electronic-cigarettes-and-health.html
My feelings on this article are mixed. On the one hand they are ripping apart the stupid arguments of the e-cig haters, while on the other hand they claim less research has been done than has actually been done. I especially have issue with them saying that the Huffington Post says they haven't been proven as a quit smoking tool, and then they just leave the statement alone, saying it doesn't matter. I have at least a few studies on my computer proving that they are effective to that end. They also keep implying in the article that studies are inconsistent or inconclusive, when in reality the studies are not - it's the way the studies are being interpreted that is inconsistent and inconclusive.
Overall a very mixed article - seems anti-anti e-cig, but not pro e-cig either. Unfortunately you can't comment on the article.
What does everyone think of this?
doctortipster.
com/24213-electronic-cigarettes-and-health.html
My feelings on this article are mixed. On the one hand they are ripping apart the stupid arguments of the e-cig haters, while on the other hand they claim less research has been done than has actually been done. I especially have issue with them saying that the Huffington Post says they haven't been proven as a quit smoking tool, and then they just leave the statement alone, saying it doesn't matter. I have at least a few studies on my computer proving that they are effective to that end. They also keep implying in the article that studies are inconsistent or inconclusive, when in reality the studies are not - it's the way the studies are being interpreted that is inconsistent and inconclusive.
Overall a very mixed article - seems anti-anti e-cig, but not pro e-cig either. Unfortunately you can't comment on the article.
What does everyone think of this?
Last edited: