Does this seem right to you?
- Thread starter khalidmna
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
How exactly does one trade mark a plain bottle? by the font they use...what if that font looks cute, marketing towards children!!!!!!
Been there. Done That.
Or have you forgotten about those Hundred of so Posts we have Exchanged in that Poll Thread?
In one corner we have those that say screw that, I'm going to kick them in the nuts.
And in the other corner we have those that say if you kick them in the nuts they'll blow your head off.
Love these threads!
I vote for kicking them in the nuts.
But it would be nice to disarm them prior to kicking.
I suppose if we don't kick them in the nuts, they might only blow off an arm or two.
That's better, right?
And in the other corner we have those that say if you kick them in the nuts they'll blow your head off.
Love these threads!
I vote for kicking them in the nuts.
But it would be nice to disarm them prior to kicking.
I suppose if we don't kick them in the nuts, they might only blow off an arm or two.
That's better, right?
Yes it does:
Tobacco companies file lawsuits against UK Government over plain packaging laws - Health News - Health & Families - The Independent
Funny that you support all the anti-tobacoo measures, except on vaping.
I haven't forgotten, and that's what I'm referring to. Hundreds of posts, and not a single reason in that thread that wasn't based on either "it looks like smoking, so there must be possible harms like smoking" or "we just don't know, even though there's this mountain of data"
In one corner we have those that say screw that, I'm going to kick them in the nuts.
And in the other corner we have those that say if you kick them in the nuts they'll blow your head off.
Love these threads!
I vote for kicking them in the nuts.
But it would be nice to disarm them prior to kicking.
I suppose if we don't kick them in the nuts, they might only blow off an arm or two.
That's better, right?
I'd say lets save some formaldehyde for embalming those nuts.
A trademark is a recognizable sign, design or expression which identifies products or services of a particular source from those of othersInvisible Ink?
a printed plain labeled bottle isn't a trademark
Unless the bottle itself has a very peculiar shape.
All I know is if it wasn't Figured out in the 500 or so Posts there, I don't think it will be Figured out Here.
BTW - You can say that Vapers are thinking something because "it looks like smoking" all you want. But I think when it comes to Vapers, you would be Wrong about 99 times out of 100.
For the General Public? 60%+ ? But of course, that Number is Highly Debatable.
If the Cartoon Character was taken Off the Bottle Label in the OP's post, would You be about to tell what Company the e-Liquid came from?
How many Cartoon Characters are Allowed on Cigarette Packages? Either here in the USA, in Canada, or in the UK?
But the Big Question here. Why do you think Cartoon Characters should be Allowed on Bottles of e-Liquids that Contain Nicotine?
kiddy pics are necessary so that pols can stand up and yell and this is necessary so that regulations and taxes can be placed on ejuices it is called win /win ( was/ is it intentional -who knows only Woodward and Bernstein)
The truth of the matter is that in any issue involving Money, Money Wins. Sorry to say that because that Kills Vaping, which I love. The only win comes from exposing the powers that be as the corrupt money grubbers that they really are. What happens to kids is just righteous debate. What really matters is that Pile Of Money.
It wasn't "figured out" because myself and others on my side of the debate kept providing data when asked, and the other side simply said things like "of course not" "it's an adult activity" without providing any scientifically based reason on a matter of public health.
I say they can't get past "it looks like smoking" because on all of these issues that illicit a gut reaction, there are a high number(at least as evidence on this forum, by that poll thread) that associate vaping with smoking, even when the evidence suggests otherwise.
See this post:
Why should they not be, nicotine or no? I'd like something other than "because some will think it's marketing to kids."
1. None. There's a limited set of pictures that are mandated by the government to be used on tobacco packages (the black lungs etc). Is this what you would like to see on eliquid bottles?
2. Since the bottles are to be sold only to adults, I see no problem with them having any pictures from cartoons to erotica.
- Status
Similar threads
