Stupid article and couldn't get it to take a comment with FB or Google and didn't feel like registering. Also, you can vote early and often so the survey is also lame.
*edit* I did get it to post via Chrome but no luck in Firefox.
It wouldn't take my comment either. Probably a good thing though, cuz I kinda went off on a tangent about that whisker dude not being a medical expert, he just sells big Pharma concept like the author is obviously doing.
Ha! And that's with just one beer ...
*giggles* - yeah 90% for "no" is not bad, ey?
Stupid article - yeah, I just love "lighting up" my e-cigs... although metal does not burn well.. sigh... .. and "nice" poll.. hehe
Anybody else able to comment yet? I'd love to hear his response to the question: "is it proper etiquette to source an Anti Advocate, but not a Pro Advocate, to someone who pleads for truths in hoping to arrive at an informed decision?"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.