E-Cigarette Battle Continues
- Thread starter mpetva
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Just goes to show the news about "Governments very concerned" always takes precedence over "new product might benefit people." And all these articles cast a glaring spot light on the truth about smoking bans, had nothing to do with second hand smoke.
Last night I watched "Demolition Man" on TV and all I could think during the whole thing was "wow, that's exactly where we are headed".
Last night I watched "Demolition Man" on TV and all I could think during the whole thing was "wow, that's exactly where we are headed".
This bullcrap is getting annoying.
What I dont get, is even IF there are carcinogens in e-cigarettes, there far less than what is in analogs.
All the tox screens I have read come back with little to no toxins (besides nicotine).
Let us have our "Healthier" product... damn.
We started vaping, not to kill ourselves, but to prevent killing ourselves.
What I dont get, is even IF there are carcinogens in e-cigarettes, there far less than what is in analogs.
All the tox screens I have read come back with little to no toxins (besides nicotine).
Let us have our "Healthier" product... damn.
We started vaping, not to kill ourselves, but to prevent killing ourselves.
And on a related note:
U.S Newspaper Circulation Continues to Decline
Gee, think that has anything to do with the fact that journalists no longer bother to ask questions? To do real reporting? It's just easier to print extracts from press releases, I guess.
U.S Newspaper Circulation Continues to Decline
Gee, think that has anything to do with the fact that journalists no longer bother to ask questions? To do real reporting? It's just easier to print extracts from press releases, I guess.
This one has been around for awhile, it just gets reprinted in the news like it's a new article. You can tell by comments such as "getting around the smoking ban", that the writer is an anti-smoker/vaper.
- Status
Similar threads
