I have to thank Dutch on QSMB for causing me to find this article: Is a 14% Chantix success rate worth risking death?
Which led me to these articles, which - even though it's a "cold turkey" site and anti-nicotine - has a goldmine of info that supports claims also made by THR advocates:
GlaxoSmithKline Continues Defrauding Smokers
Little communication in failed war against smoking
Smokefree.gov really Buymeds.now
And there were many more!
Of course, there were also a lot of anti-nicotine claims. This one was my favorite false statement:

So, none of us enjoyed smoking. That sure explains a lot of the attitudes on QSMB. (Many of them consider whyquit.com the bible for quitting smoking.)
The above statement is the single greatest reason why the antis cannot understand why smokers won't quit, even with all of their exaggerated health claims (when the real health risks should be sufficient) and nasty pictures of diseased smokers' bodies. The fact that enjoying "clean" nicotine in a familiar way - one that reflects what we enjoyed about smoking - has been more successful than that exact same nicotine in the form of a gum or a patch shows that there are many aspects of smoking many smokers "enjoyed."
Once they understand that many smokers DO enjoy it as an activity, they'll be able accept that THR is the answer to get those folks to quit.
Which led me to these articles, which - even though it's a "cold turkey" site and anti-nicotine - has a goldmine of info that supports claims also made by THR advocates:
GlaxoSmithKline Continues Defrauding Smokers
On October 28, 2010, the day following an announcement that GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) had agreed to pay a $750 million fine in a fraud case, GSK's Consumer Healthcare division issued a press release asserting that, "NRT products offer a step-down therapy that doubles a smoker's chances of quitting versus cold turkey."
It's time to stop being afraid and simply say it. Through and through, GSK's statement is a fraudulent marketing misrepresentation.
Truth is, NRT (nicotine replacement therapy) has failed to prevail over cold turkey quitters in nearly every long-term quitting method survey conducted to date. GSK knows that just last year cold turkey quitters defeated NRT quitters in a survey conducted by four GSK consultants.
Little communication in failed war against smoking
Pharmaceutical industry influence continues its stranglehold over Smokefree.gov's primary creator, the Tobacco Control Research Branch (TCRB) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Interestingly, the primary author of this just released HHS inter-agency communication study, Scott J. Leischow, PhD, is also listed at SmokeFree.gov as a site developer and advisor. Dr. Leischow disclosed as part of a March 11, 2009 Journal of the American Medical Association article that he is a "paid speaker for Pfizer" (which sells Chantix) and a "consultant for Johnson & Johnson" (which sells replacement nicotine products including Nicorette).
Industry influence has so deeply infected all levels of HHS cessation thinking that there seems little hope of capping the well. How bad is it? During 2007 the NCI co-sponsored a 3 day industry sales conference where the Who's Who of pharmaceutical industry consultants openly advocated use of tobacco industry marketing tactics in order to sell even greater quantities of replacement nicotine.
Smokefree.gov really Buymeds.now
Pharmaceutical industry influence, too thick to cut with a chainsaw, continues its stranglehold over Smokefree.gov's creator, the Tobacco Control Research Branch (TCRB) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The NCI remained silent when in June 2000 a panel of experts with strong financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry was allowed to write official U.S. quitting policy. "There are numerous effective medications for tobacco dependence," the panel proclaimed, "and clinicians should encourage their use by all patients attempting to quit smoking."
Smokefree.gov's "Medications to Help You Quit" page states that "medicines can double your chances of quitting for good." Its "Quit Guide" again echoes that "medicines can double your chances of quitting for good." Its "Dispelling Myths about Nicotine Replacement Therapy" page continues the drum roll that, "NRT can double a smoker's chances of quitting smoking." And the chorus reaches crescendo inside the site's Clearing the Air quitting booklet which claims, "Studies show that these medications, compared with trying to quit without them, can double or triple your chances of quitting for good."
TCRB's double "your" chances campaign isn't limited to Smokefree.gov. Dr. Backinger presented a Powerpoint presentation in May 2007 claiming that, "pharmocotherapy can double the smoker's chance of quitting smoking." Why noteworthy? Because Dr. Backinger gave the presentation a year after a National Cancer Institute study found otherwise.
Far from doubling "your" chances, a 2006 NCI study found that those quitting without medications actually had slightly higher long-term success rates than those using medications. Yes, as horrible as this sounds, the NCI's Smokefree.gov website evidences what may be the most deadly government health deception ever.
Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Kevin Helliker exposed the depth of pharmaceutical influence over NCI cessation policy in a 2007 front page Wall Street Journal article entitled, "Nicotine Fix - Behind Antismoking Policy, Influence of Drug Industry." The story shared unpublished data from a June 2006 NCI survey of 8,200 quitters.
And there were many more!
Of course, there were also a lot of anti-nicotine claims. This one was my favorite false statement:
Smokers don't smoke because they enjoy it, but because they don't enjoy what happens when they don't smoke. They don't hold or puff on cigarettes because they like to, they do so because they must, because they are true drug addicts in every sense, because their brain has been rewired to function on nicotine, because every two hours their body's nicotine reserves decline by half.

So, none of us enjoyed smoking. That sure explains a lot of the attitudes on QSMB. (Many of them consider whyquit.com the bible for quitting smoking.)
The above statement is the single greatest reason why the antis cannot understand why smokers won't quit, even with all of their exaggerated health claims (when the real health risks should be sufficient) and nasty pictures of diseased smokers' bodies. The fact that enjoying "clean" nicotine in a familiar way - one that reflects what we enjoyed about smoking - has been more successful than that exact same nicotine in the form of a gum or a patch shows that there are many aspects of smoking many smokers "enjoyed."
Once they understand that many smokers DO enjoy it as an activity, they'll be able accept that THR is the answer to get those folks to quit.
Last edited: