E-cigarettes generate high levels of aldehydes only in ‘dry puff’ conditions

Status
Not open for further replies.

MR. Mad

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 16, 2013
208
167
Michigan
the short story ......

Background and aims

Aldehydes are emitted by electronic cigarettes due to thermal decomposition of liquid components. Although elevated levels have been reported with new-generation high-power devices, it is unclear whether they are relevant to true exposure of users (vapers) because overheating produces an unpleasant taste, called a dry puff, which vapers learn to avoid. The aim was to evaluate aldehyde emissions at different power levels associated with normal and dry puff conditions.

Design
Two customizable atomizers were prepared so that one (A1) had a double wick, resulting in high liquid supply and lower chance of overheating at high power levels, while the other (A2) was a conventional setup (single wick). Experienced vapers took 4-s puffs at 6.5 watts (W), 7.5 W, 9 W and 10 W power levels with both atomizers and were asked to report whether dry puffs were generated. The atomizers were then attached to a smoking machine and aerosol was trapped.

Setting
Clinic office and analytical chemistry laboratory in Greece.

Participants
Seven experienced vapers.

Measurements
Aldehyde levels were measured in the aerosol.

Findings
All vapers identified dry puff conditions at 9 W and 10 W with A2. A1 did not lead to dry puffs at any power level. Minimal amounts of aldehydes per 10 puffs were found at all power levels with A1 (up to 11.3 µg for formaldehyde, 4.5 µg for acetaldehyde and 1.0 µg for acrolein) and at 6.5 W and 7.5 W with A2 (up to 3.7 µg for formaldehyde, 0.8 µg for acetaldehyde and 1.3 µg for acrolein). The levels were increased by 30 to 250 times in dry puff conditions (up to 344.6 µg for formaldehyde, 206.3 µg for acetaldehyde and 210.4 µg for acrolein, P < 0.001), while acetone was detected only in dry puff conditions (up to 22.5 µg).

Conclusions
Electronic cigarettes produce high levels of aldehyde only in dry puff conditions, in which the liquid overheats, causing a strong unpleasant taste that e-cigarette users detect and avoid. Under normal vaping conditions aldehyde emissions are minimal, even in new-generation high-power e-cigarettes.

Conclusion

Aldehyde emissions in EC aerosol are associated directly with dry puff conditions. In normal vaping conditions, the levels of aldehydes emissions are minimal and by far lower than the levels in tobacco cigarette smoke, despite the use of high power levels. In dry puff conditions, aldehyde emissions are significantly elevated to very high levels, but vapers are not expected to be exposed to such levels during normal EC use, even when they use new-generation high-power devices.


the long story a good read
E-cigarettes generate high levels of aldehydes only in ‘dry puff’ conditions - Farsalinos - 2015 - Addiction - Wiley Online Library
 
Last edited:

sedition

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 20, 2014
443
346
New Zealand
The problem is how it's disseminated to the public. The analogy should be something like burning steak - there are probably some nasties in the char when it gets overcooked, but you're not aiming for that, it's not a normal condition, and we don't need to ban steak to protect those who can't help burning it.

One would hope that temp control would shut up the chicken little politicians, but we all know they'll just go back to their default 'think of the children' dance routine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KattMamma

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,315
1
83,842
So-Cal
the short story ......

This is a Topic that has been brought up a few times.

But it is Good that you Posted the work that Dr. F has published. Because it puts Numbers that were Scientifically deterred to what we have been saying. Verses us just saying it.

Thanks again for Posting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohm Gnome

DCBD

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 21, 2014
355
752
USA
There's a thread that dr f has been commenting on that's similar. I don't know how to link to it but it's a couple pages back.

This refers to a new study done by Dr. Farsalinos (et al.) to debunk the formaldehyde junk science paper published in the NEJM in January. It's not as sensational as the NEJM article, just a real scientific study backed by facts.
 
Last edited:

MR. Mad

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 16, 2013
208
167
Michigan
There's a thread that dr f has been commenting on that's similar. I don't know how to link to it but it's a couple pages back.

There are lots of people interested, it's just that it's sort of old news.There have been a lot of threads about it over the last several weeks.

This is a Topic that has been brought up a few times.

But it is Good that you Posted the work that Dr. F has published. Because it puts Numbers that were Scientifically deterred to what we have been saying. Verses us just saying it.

Thanks again for Posting.
i understand that this has been discussed before but this is the actual paper from the good Dr.Farsalinos First published: 20 May 2015
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattiem
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread