And people that very well be making good and inexpensive
ejuice will be regulated out of the market. I think it's a bit hypocritical that you want your choice of what to buy, but don't care about the supplier's choice of what to sell or how to limit costs. Maybe we should require clinical testing and certifiable ingredients for you home cookers out there too, just to make sure it's fit for your own consumption. It's your responsibility to ensure that the
ejuice you're consuming (remember, suppliers aren't shoving it down your throat) be safe. Otherwise, why are you
vaping the stuff? Some people are fine buying unproven goods, because they can be much much cheaper. You're not. Pay more, but don't tell them they can't pay less.
The simple fact is, Kate, your requests could easily be met by any supplier. At a price. If they see a large demand, they may just go for it. As it stands, I see pretty much all suppliers as a bit shady. I would certainly be willing to pay for proven quality ejuice, and from the sound of it you would too. I fully support you in that endeavour, but I would rather the government stay the hell out of ecigs completely, because it's none of their business what I put in me.
I do think it would be neat to work out a specific set of requests that suppliers meet, leave the politics out completely and just say:
a) we want provably good ingredients
b) instead of force feeding mice ejuice, pump nicotine-free vape into their cage
etc.