I'm afraid I can't make head nor tail of that test report from Janty posted on the last link. It doesn't seem to say anything about testing and looking at it again, even the ingredient list is obscured. Don't get me wrong, I think that Janty is a reputable company and if they say they have had their eliquid tested I will take their word for it. I use Janty juice, I'd still like to see a proper toxicology report though. That report is printed with a SGS heading, I think this must be them -
SGS - inspection, verification, testing & certification services. They must have produced a report with some substance if they were commissioned to test for safety. What does it say?
Ludo said "
All our liquids, either used for cartridges or sold as liquid bottle are APPROVED TUV and approved by the University of Naples, Italy and the Italian Ministry of Health as SAFE and LEGAL for sale." 'Approved TUV' - what does that mean? I Googled TUV and got this site -
Home - TV Rheinland Group It looks like a commercial lab to me. It would be good if we could see their report. 'approved by the University of Naples' - again, what did they have to say? 'Safe and legal' for sale in Italy - ok that's good but what are the requirements of the Italian Ministry of Health to prove safety and legality? Do they require clinical trials? Do the ingredients simply have to be food safe?
I'm not deliberately picking Janty as a baddie, in fact I think they are probably one of the more respectable companies we deal with. What I'm trying to say is that we really need to examine the detail of esmoking claims to gauge the standards. If they are prepared to put forward resources for analysis the most likely outcome I can see is confident customers and brand loyalty.
MacFan did say he would list his ingredients and show us the lab reports. Maybe we just need to be patient with Johnson Creek, it's a new business and they are finding their feet. The question is if they can be trusted with our health while they work things out.