6 weeks, 100 edits, every assertion backed up with a link to an authoritative source. That was the process.
Simply not possible for me to write everything I think in the article. Much of what I think on this straddles the line between belief and hope and none of that made it in - so, sorry for that, but I'm pretty happy with the overall tenor. Don't agree at all that it favors ANTZ rhetoric - the WHO quote was purposely chosen to frame the absurdity of creating a monopoly for the tobacco industry.
"Wouldn't lowering the entry requirements benefit BT as well?"
No, I don't believe so. There's two disruptions that e-cigs are causing. The first is to the way nicotine is being delivered; the second is where it is being sold.
BT has no access to the vapestore/online segment, and this scares them.
Simply not possible for me to write everything I think in the article. Much of what I think on this straddles the line between belief and hope and none of that made it in - so, sorry for that, but I'm pretty happy with the overall tenor. Don't agree at all that it favors ANTZ rhetoric - the WHO quote was purposely chosen to frame the absurdity of creating a monopoly for the tobacco industry.
"Wouldn't lowering the entry requirements benefit BT as well?"
No, I don't believe so. There's two disruptions that e-cigs are causing. The first is to the way nicotine is being delivered; the second is where it is being sold.
BT has no access to the vapestore/online segment, and this scares them.
Last edited:
