FDA Proposed regulation is available

[Worzel]

I think you're half correct about this. I've been wondering, though, whether vapers who have actual evidence of their own health improvements (say, improved COPD scores) should be submitting this. After all, we certainly do want a lot of responses to the consultation, and those responses need to be evidence based, as far as I understand it.

The question is, though, what the FDA will consider to be evidence. I would suggest that an accompanying letter from a physician would be enough, but I don't know. So far they only seem to be considering 'bound volumes', to quote Carl Phillips (i.e. scientific journals) to be admissible.

But getting physicians to go with us on this would be the tricky part! After all, they are the one who write the prescriptions for Chantix! I just don't think we should be making health claims to the FDA. But we need to point out how vendors have been a step ahead of them and self regulating anyways!


Sent from my bird in a moist little package

 

[Kent C]

It's Humpty Dumpty legislation:

"`When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less.'"

http://comparativelawblog.blogspot.com/2006/12/humpty-dumpty-and-law.html

I go by the same 'rule'. Unfortunately, people like to 'fill in' their own significances - it's caused me problems, but not from what I said, only from what they thought I said.

 

[Katya]

It's Humpty Dumpty legislation:

"`When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less.'"

http://comparativelawblog.blogspot.com/2006/12/humpty-dumpty-and-law.html

Yes sir.

Or, in other words,

....It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing.

 

[aikanae1]

sux to be us.