FDA Sends Warning Letters

Status
Not open for further replies.

jRP

Moved On
Jul 25, 2010
243
0
GA
Bull...., FDA has yet to approve e-cigarettes, but approved Analogs for how many years?
Think about it over 4,000 chemicals, tar, carcinogens, tobacco leafs, paper, newly added carpet glue (FSC - Fire Safe Cigarette) My ... FSC, I was able to put a cigarette down and it still burned up, although some did go out, 40% of the time they burned up anyways.
The FDA in simple terms is ......ed.
 
"Please be aware that the FDA has issued a letter addressed to the Electronic Cigarette Association (ECA) which explains in detail how the electronic cigarette industry can begin the drug approval process."

Is this for the e-cig device, or the e-juice, or both?

Probably both. The E-Cig Device is considered the device, and the juice is the drug.
 

PoliticallyIncorrect

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 31, 2010
4,118
6,562
SoCal
I think it was fair of the FDA to send the letter to the companies selling so called vaping meds. Companies like that will cause us all issues.

Can't argue with that. We--and I speak collectively of the vaping community, which includes suppliers--need to clean our own house of these cockroaches: Electronic Cigarette | E Cigarette | E Liquid - Healthcare E-Liq

The issue at hand, though, is the written warnings to the five stateside suppliers. To that, I'd be helpless to articulate a better response than this: The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary
 

GypsyVisions

Full Member
Aug 29, 2010
63
0
Tennessee
Can't argue with that. We--and I speak collectively of the vaping community, which includes suppliers--need to clean our own house of these cockroaches: Electronic Cigarette | E Cigarette | E Liquid - Healthcare E-Liq

Now this company just pisses me off !! Because these dumbnuts are marketing other drugs to use in PV's they can ruin it for all of us!

The issue at hand, though, is the written warnings to the five stateside suppliers. To that, I'd be helpless to articulate a better response than this: The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary

Excellent commentary. Thanks so much for sharing this blog. I sit here feeling helpless that they (big gov) are gonna take my right to own and use a PV away from me then I'll be a criminal for using a PV. I already felt like a freaking outcast for still smoking analogs. I am so sick and tired of strangers telling me what the heck I can and cannot do because apparently I am too freaking stupid to make decisions for myself!!! Ughhhh!! I could just sock someone in the face right now.....where's Snooki?
 

sp33d

Full Member
Mar 3, 2010
6
0
vegas
Bull...., FDA has yet to approve e-cigarettes, but approved Analogs for how many years?
Think about it over 4,000 chemicals, tar, carcinogens, tobacco leafs, paper, newly added carpet glue (FSC - Fire Safe Cigarette) My ... FSC, I was able to put a cigarette down and it still burned up, although some did go out, 40% of the time they burned up anyways.
The FDA in simple terms is ......ed.

Amen! FDA is ......ed for sure
 

darlasue

Full Member
Sep 1, 2010
37
0
Florida
I finally understood the purpose of government (including the FDA) by listening to podcasts by a guy named Alan Watt who has a show on underground radio. It's been a while since I listened, but I once heard him explain the war on cigarettes. It's not about our health (obviously), it's about the coating that cigs put on your lungs. Not swearing this is true, but many things he spoke of a few years back are reality today. He said the goal was to allow certain nanoparticles (delivered via chemtrail) to "install" in your lungs. Cigarette smoke causes lungs to be coated inside, which disallows the installation of said nanoparticle (nanoweapon?).

Seems farfetched, but makes a whole lot more sense than them "protecting" us. Hell, the only growing industries this country has are health care and privatized prisons. They NEED people to be sick! If they wanted to protect people from disease-causing cigarettes, they'd admit cancer is preventable (even for smokers) and make it common knowledge that disease grows in an acid environment. A little baking sode every day will keep your body a cancer-free zone.

For the same reason they put fluoride in your water (as did Hitler, in every area he conquered), they want your lungs to be receptive to their toxic goodies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread