2) Some crazy woman who is in tobacco control in Indiana was on the final panel of the day. Bill revealed that she's a long-time prohibitionist, and that was the tone of her speech. She brought up how when Marlboro Snus was test-marketed in Indianapolis, surveys revealed that while non-smoking teens weren't using them, teens who were smokers did (the horror!). Next, she complained that some Marlboro Snus intended for the Indianapolis market actually ended up being sent -- not by the tobacco companies -- to troops in Iraq (keep on smoking soliders!). Last, she briefly brought up e-cigarettes, and said that they may complicate smoking laws and lead to people lighting up, which literally made me laugh out loud.
At the end of the panel, she had a closing statement in which she told the panel to remember that their duty is to "do no harm." Considering this is a panel on MODIFIED RISK tobacco PRODUCTS, this struck me as silly. So I went up to her and asked why she'd say that. She blew me off within 10 seconds, telling me, "Well, that's the message I wanted to convey."
See my response #8 in this thread: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/media-general-news/218921-smokeless-tobacco-cnbc.html