Yeah the one button on my provari is the only slightly negative for me. I decided on the SS VAMO. I'll be getting one later.
- Status
The single button doesn't bother me much as I use the same cartos and juice most of the time. If I was switching devices or juices often it might be more of an issue.
I have a VAMO and a second ProV inbound so I dont expect I'll be buying anymore mods till next fall. I really want a 9/11 tribute iHybrid!
I have a VAMO and a second ProV inbound so I dont expect I'll be buying anymore mods till next fall. I really want a 9/11 tribute iHybrid!
Atleast the Provari has a semi-decent user interface for a single button mod.
Granted ... the more features you add, the more loops you have to jump through with a single button. Still ... the menu system on the Zmax was "cryptic".
I can practically test a juice at every wattage with a Vamo in the time it takes to change a single wattage setting on a Zmax. lol
Granted ... the more features you add, the more loops you have to jump through with a single button. Still ... the menu system on the Zmax was "cryptic".
I can practically test a juice at every wattage with a Vamo in the time it takes to change a single wattage setting on a Zmax. lol
I have a SS Vamo coming soon.
My chrome one is still going strong, but the SS should be much nicer.
not sure if this has been mentioned, but i just found out or realized it has no OHM meter, watched a review on youtube and the guy had to test his atty on a provari to find the OHMS, how on earth can it not have an OHM meter?
It does have an OHM meter, the video you watched the dudes not speaking English so I'm sure thats why you skipped seeing him go to option 5 (LCD Display) you can display the current voltage, atomizers resistance, as well as battery voltage under load.
^ahhh i was gunna say that was weird, i thought it had to have had one, i read over it in the description.
Glad to see that I'm not the only one who likes the aluminum and it's lighter weight.
At first I thought this would be a lighter Siegal Zmax, with modular parts. But, now I'm thinking it may be more like the E Vic, without the upgradable possibilities and USB charging capability. (btw, the evic is looking pretty sweet these days as the versions get much more user friendly.)
At first I thought this would be a lighter Siegal Zmax, with modular parts. But, now I'm thinking it may be more like the E Vic, without the upgradable possibilities and USB charging capability. (btw, the evic is looking pretty sweet these days as the versions get much more user friendly.)
FYI - a technical review of the CVI with plenty of numbers:
VV/VW-Akkuträger Anyvape CVI oder: auf dem Gerätemarkt wirds bunt.. » Mountain Prophet
Yeah, it is in German - but the site has a google translate feature
.
VV/VW-Akkuträger Anyvape CVI oder: auf dem Gerätemarkt wirds bunt.. » Mountain Prophet
Yeah, it is in German - but the site has a google translate feature
.
The aluminum looks like a big win. Stainless had almost twice the resistance than the aluminum and anodized aluminum quite durable, strong, ight and scratch resistant. My old 69 Buick weighed almost a ton more than my latest car, I don't miss it.
The tail cap especially looks good and should avoid the on-going continuity problems of the cheap loose threaded Vamo tail cap with it's 3¢ spring.
The tail cap especially looks good and should avoid the on-going continuity problems of the cheap loose threaded Vamo tail cap with it's 3¢ spring.
And here are a couple of pictures of the AnyVape "V2", with the short and long tube. Looks like someone at AnyVape liked the eVic look. They are planning on selling both the V1 and V2; they're NOT discontinuing the V1. I asked them on their FB page if the display in the V2 is going to be horizontal, or vertical like the V1. They haven't replied yet. I can't wait for PB's review, and the reports here. I was pretty well sold on the Sigelei, but I think the AnyVape may be a better choice.
I MUCH prefer the V1 look, though the V2 in black looks pretty good...
hmmm. did I do something wrong with the picture attachments? Should the "attach" strings be visible? And the pictures themselves are much larger than what shows up in the post. (Sorry, newby questions)
I MUCH prefer the V1 look, though the V2 in black looks pretty good...
hmmm. did I do something wrong with the picture attachments? Should the "attach" strings be visible? And the pictures themselves are much larger than what shows up in the post. (Sorry, newby questions)
Last edited:
If it had sturdy wiring then the rest sure is on the outside!
One fine looking piece.I think the lack of multiple buttons make it look way cleaner.Some PV's just look like robot faces!
One fine looking piece.I think the lack of multiple buttons make it look way cleaner.Some PV's just look like robot faces!
Accuracy is indeed very good:
http://www.mountainprophet.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CVI-VV-18650.pdf
http://www.mountainprophet.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CVI-VV-2x18350.pdf
http://www.mountainprophet.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CVI-VW-18650.pdf
http://www.mountainprophet.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CVI-VW-2x18350.pdf
But I'd prefer the V1 design over the V2 design.
First of all, I like the V1 look more and secondly, with the V2 "plastic head" I am sensing potential heat dissipation problems due to the powerful electronics. Joyetech had good reasons to limit their eVic to approx. 11 Watts despite users demanding more power - as far as I know this decision was all about heat dissipation.
Aside from the head design, there is no technical difference between V1 and V2 according to the manufacturer.
The battery tubes are also the same (oh, and compatible to the eVic battery tubes BTW, so you can screw on a V1 or V2 CVI head on an eVic tube and vice versa, for instance).
http://www.mountainprophet.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CVI-VV-18650.pdf
http://www.mountainprophet.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CVI-VV-2x18350.pdf
http://www.mountainprophet.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CVI-VW-18650.pdf
http://www.mountainprophet.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CVI-VW-2x18350.pdf
But I'd prefer the V1 design over the V2 design.
First of all, I like the V1 look more and secondly, with the V2 "plastic head" I am sensing potential heat dissipation problems due to the powerful electronics. Joyetech had good reasons to limit their eVic to approx. 11 Watts despite users demanding more power - as far as I know this decision was all about heat dissipation.
Aside from the head design, there is no technical difference between V1 and V2 according to the manufacturer.
The battery tubes are also the same (oh, and compatible to the eVic battery tubes BTW, so you can screw on a V1 or V2 CVI head on an eVic tube and vice versa, for instance).
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
