I know, but you can say the samething about perfume.
The difference is when you're chewing gum or wearing a patch, it is you and you alone who is getting the nicotine exposure. Can you or anyone guarantee 100%, that a non-smoker who inhales my vapor is NOT getting nicotine exposure?
According to that logic, they need to put a ban on cars because everyday I breath in secondhand carbon monoxide, and let's not forget to ban burrito's and other fine foods......see where I'm going with this? yes, excess methane production due to food, so let's ban eating as well.
Their are only two 100% proven theories in this life, taxes and death.
just my two cents
"Government Inteligence"
What gets me is this. Have you ever seen a cigarette burning? It never stops... the second hand smoke is constantly floating around even when the smoker is not inhaling it. I imagine the exhale is harmless by comparison, most of the harmful chemicals already having been deposited in the lungs of the smoker. The second hand smoke that is really harmful is all that constant smoke coming from the cigarette that fills the air as it burns.
Think about it... the e-cig isn't continually spewing out vapor. It is only putting out vapor that is immediately inhaled by the person vaping. And even if you are vaping high nicotine juice, how much of the nicotine do you think would even be exhaled? What next? Banning nicotine gum because you could spit and get nicotine juice on someone who chooses not to chew nicotine gum, or maybe breathe out and send nicotine fumes into the air? Give me a break! It is not about our health, it is all about money - and States are losing a lot of Tax money gained from smoking.