EU Flawed science, irregular procedure, unlawful measures-Clive Bates
- Thread starter Orb Skewer
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
I'm not sure anyone is listening Ania or knows what (or who) they should be listening to, It's as if they have a pre determined 'shape' that they want e cigs to fit into-and are making a rip roaring cobbled together mess trying to achieve that, 'square peg round hole', if this gets rubber stamped they are making a rod for their backs, there is just so much wrong with the proposals to merit legal challenges in perpetuity, most of it doesn't make sense, a lot of it defies logic and some of it is just bizarre. It is either a case of people being out of their depth, or there is an agenda being played out.
I think most in Europe see e cigs and their associated parafernalia as neither a tobacco product nor medicine, but a purely recreational product which has other obvious benefits, Article 18 should be withdrawn and a new standalone directive drawn up for e cigs, or they ditch A18 and review it again in 5 years time-once they know what they are dealing with.
I think most in Europe see e cigs and their associated parafernalia as neither a tobacco product nor medicine, but a purely recreational product which has other obvious benefits, Article 18 should be withdrawn and a new standalone directive drawn up for e cigs, or they ditch A18 and review it again in 5 years time-once they know what they are dealing with.
Moi? I think it's both of the above... and probably 3. too stupid and/or arrogant to recognize their own idiocy.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
