Fox Poll "Is it irresponsible for celebrities to promote the use of e-cigarettes?"

[low_tar_neil]

You know what to do!

Is it irresponsible for celebrities to promote the use of e-cigarettes? | Fox Nation

 

[NorthOfAtlanta]

Done, some good comments on there.

 

[Rosenec]

Or is it responsible?

 

[Erncig]

Sure go after ecigs.... but I guess promoting fake ... whores like Miley Cirus and the rest of them to Children is fine isn't it Fox?

Hypocrites!

 

[AgentAnia]

Added my vote, yessirree!

 

[Jake6731]

Please read the question carefully. In this case, a NO answer is what is needed..

 

[AgentAnia]

Please read the question carefully. In this case, a NO answer is what is needed..

And a resounding NO is what they got from me (in case my previous post confused you... )

 

[kathi17]

I voted no, and enjoyed reading the comments.

Funny how it's okay to glamorize drinking, which is involved in so many deadly accidents, fights and domestic violence, but it's not okay to promote quitting smoking by using the only thing that seems to work. And now we should legalize ........., and that isn't going to make kids have more access to it?

Hmmm, I didn't realize that we couldn't mention the m word here.

 

[TaylorPlayer]

Another NO vote and they are leading! I think about 98% of the comments were in favor of Ecigs!

 

[sonicdsl]

I voted no, and enjoyed reading the comments.

Funny how it's okay to glamorize drinking, which is involved in so many deadly accidents, fights and domestic violence, but it's not okay to promote quitting smoking by using the only thing that seems to work. And now we should legalize ........., and that isn't going to make kids have more access to it?

Hmmm, I didn't realize that we couldn't mention the m word here.

Nope!

http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...ation/255864-why-we-dont-allow-drug-talk.html

Sent while Moderating ECF via Tapatalk 4

 

[Kent C]

Nope!

http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...ation/255864-why-we-dont-allow-drug-talk.html

Sent while Moderating ECF via Tapatalk 4

This is an example where 'rules' result in a lack of communication rather than furthering it. I understand (and agree with) the idea not to speak of certain subjects in the general and new members forums and most others, but when arguments regarding this certain subject are used by anti's in order to either tax, regulate, or in some way discredit vaping in any possible way they can, then not be able to reasonably argue against such tactics, inhibits and harms our intended goals and purposes here.

Goals and purposes have a higher relative importance than 'rule's' or 'good ideas'. They are the 'senior concepts' that rules are made to carry out. They are the reason, why there are rules - to further goals and purposes. When rules work against those, then they should be rejected by rational moderation.

 

[kathi17]

Nope!

http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...ation/255864-why-we-dont-allow-drug-talk.html

Sent while Moderating ECF via Tapatalk 4

That makes perfect sense. Thanks for the link!

 

[kathi17]

This is an example where 'rules' result in a lack of communication rather than furthering it. I understand (and agree with) the idea not to speak of certain subjects in the general and new members forums and most others, but when arguments regarding this certain subject are used by anti's in order to either tax, regulate, or in some way discredit vaping in any possible way they can, then not be able to reasonably argue against such tactics, inhibits and harms our intended goals and purposes here.

Goals and purposes have a higher relative importance than 'rule's' or 'good ideas'. They are the 'senior concepts' that rules are made to carry out. They are the reason, why there are rules - to further goals and purposes. When rules work against those, then they should be rejected by rational moderation.

I think the rules were made so this forum wouldn't come up in a search engine. I agree with the rule not to mention certain things by name for that reason. What bothers me is that the worst type of anti e-cig people in my state are pushing for the legalization of these "things".

 

[Kent C]

I think the rules were made so this forum wouldn't come up in a search engine. I agree with the rule not to mention certain things by name for that reason.

I agree with that part...