Fox news poll go vote

Status
Not open for further replies.

FearTX

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 15, 2013
2,718
13,128
Outside of Austin, The Republic of Texas
yesno.JPG

Voted for Victory!
 

CykoDad

Full Member
Verified Member
Nov 21, 2013
53
36
Laurel, MD, USA
http://nation.foxnews.com/poll/2014/01/14/is-it-irresponsible-for-celebrities-to-promote-use-e-cigarettes/

I just voted. Results show YES: 39% NO: 45% I'M NOT SURE: 16%. I also offered up this comment based on something that has been pissing me off lately regarding a few arguments I've seen from the anti-everything community:

I smoked 1-2 packs of cigarettes for 25 years. Just got into vaping a little over 2 months ago and have not had a regular cigarette since. In those couple of months since I finally kicked cigarettes I have seen so much in regards local and federal governments from around the globe trying to step in and put a stop to ecigs. Why, because the studies aren't there? They are, some people just don't like the results, and I'm almost willing to bet that those people who disagree with the results are those losing millions in profits and those seeing their corporate kickbacks dwindling.


And the whole argument about marketing to kids? Where is that coming from? I don't remember seeing magazine ads featuring young people in a club scene or hearing radio spots featuring trending music or commercials showing elaborate parties that randomly break out in the streets. Oh wait, yeah I do, I remember now. Those are beer and alcohol ads, and since everybody from executives to politicians to sports franchise owners are getting paid for those, who cares if a few kids from some irresponsible parents take part in a little underage drinking and develop a few alcohol related dependencies before legal drinking age, right? I mean according to those who's pockets are being lined so that these manufacturers can hit as big an audience as humanly possible, what's the harm in that? But show Jenny McCarthy taking a drag off an ecig, well she posed for Playboy so ecigs are evil and that evil is going to lead the children of the world to take part in far greater evils because of it.

I get it, the constant and repeated visualization of a random beach parting full of hot bods and guys with great abs and equally great hair that sprouts up in the middle of a populated downtown metropolis because somebody popped the top off of a watered down no flavor tasting bottle of beer while I'm trying to enjoy a football/basketball/soccer/hockey/baseball game with my family isn't a cause for alarm. No, that's just part of the game. But show a former Playmate and an actor I don't even remember the name of or what shows/movies he's been in plug a safer alternative to cigarettes and the world has a problem? Sounds legit.
 

Don Robertson

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 28, 2013
537
837
Rio Rancho, New Mexico
The poll means NOTHING since everyone CAN VOTE MULTIPLE TIMES. FOX is ridiculous nowadays. At one time they served a purpose. Now - just pretty girls and hunks selling crap. People buy their "polls" taking them as gospel. Allowing only one vote from an IP address is NOT that difficult. They simply want hype to talk about the next day. ACCURATE? no way.

Q: Is it irresponsible for celebrities to promote the use of e-cigarettes?

39% Yes
45% No
16% I'm not sure

One reader made the comment below. ANY 'anti' would (unless they are really lame) ask, "Says who?" All inclusive comments substantiated without rock solid PROOF do more harm than good IMHO.

"How can people possibly vote no to a product that saves lives?"

"50% of all smokers die from smoking related illness. Since the start of e-cigarette use not one person has died from a vaping related illness. Do the math. Would you rather have someone inhale a non toxic vapour, or deadly smoke. It really is that simple."

PERHAPS TRUE ........... yet claiming , "...NOT ONE" has died is illogical at best.

Senile Old Man Don
 

Mohamed

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 15, 2013
876
505
USA
ive voted 3 times so i guess u can vote as much as you want also how are they getting our state

Geo Location based on IP. Here is a site that will show you. View my IP information: 72.52.242.254 - Geo IP Tool

You can also download (some free some pay only) databases that can use on your own website to use. Some you can pay per lookup as well. It's based on the first 3 octets of the IPv4...not sure if any exist for IPv6 though.

They do have some downfalls with precision but most can get you down to the city or county level. Other downfalls is the use of proxy servers but that's another thread or another forum entirely ;) just thought I'd give you an answer.
 

Mohamed

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 15, 2013
876
505
USA
The question is worded poorly as you can see from some of the comments. For instance

If it's promoted to quit smoking YES... if promoted to get non-smokers to start vaping...NO!

That logic makes no sense...it's saying it is irresponsible to promote if used to quit smoking...and no it's not irresponsible if it's used to get non-smokers to start vaping.

So either question is worded poorly or people just aren't reading it correctly.
 

Mohamed

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 15, 2013
876
505
USA
I don't think the results will be favorable. I had to read the question twice to make sure I was voting correctly. I doubt that they would make the question straightforward enough for their regular viewers to be able to vote correctly. Of course the question has to be crafted to make the results match their agenda. There was a great example of this right on top of the comments section below the poll. I want to find the commenter and make them read the question again and highlight the word irresponsible. I fear that many will vote yes because they just skim the question before submitting an answer.

Exactly what I was talking about ;) Had to read it twice my self...and think a lot of people believe they are voting one way when they are actually voting the opposite of what they believe.
 

Don Robertson

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 28, 2013
537
837
Rio Rancho, New Mexico
Personally I think the industry could get along just fine without BOTS hawking inferior entry level products.

If BOTS means ROBOTS I suppose so; thankfully I am not aware of 'em doing it to 'me'.:) I am old and as with most abbreviations I am way behind; I just mastered "IMHO" and even that sometimes confuses me!:blink:

Where the heck was I headed with this anyways? I seem to have "fergetteded". Oh yea ........ "POLLS" like FOX and most others are not accurate; ask Beerack and Joltin'Joe - they live by and on falsehoods.:grr: And............. that's the 'truth' ........ per the "POLL" CNN did just a few days ago.:2cool:

Senile Old Man Don

** We all 'know' CNN never fibs!:unsure:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread