Frustrated with nothing being in stock

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bigfoot1974

Super Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 14, 2010
572
879
Flemingsburg, KY
www.mammothskins.com
It seems to me that all the cool toys out there are never available to buy. Is the demand for these items such as Rebuildable attys or Genesis tanks and such that nobody has the ability to keep up production. I want to spend my money but have noone to give it to. Whats going on?
 

Fury83

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 14, 2012
3,066
3,069
Nowhere
I guess I've been looking a Penelopes and AC9's. I really want a nice rebuildable atty.

ZAU's and Cobra's are nice rebuildable atty's

Z-Atty Universal - RBA's

and

Cobra Atomizer

Cobras are in my opinion the most underrated atty on the market. They are wicked light because they are titanium and uber configurable.

I had an AC9 but sold it, it wasn't any better than a Zen for me.
 

woden57

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 5, 2013
97
101
Dothan, Alabama, USA
The FDA is contemplating banning e-cigarettes. They are considering whether a few hundreds of thousands lives saved is worth the lost tax revenue and giving up the kickback$ from big tobacco and the pharmaceutical$.
Hopefully they will make a logical and fair decision, but that seems to be a rare occurrence nowadays.
 

JMarca

E-Cig Afficionado
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 19, 2013
1,522
1,987
47
New York
The FDA is contemplating banning e-cigarettes. They are considering whether a few hundreds of thousands lives saved is worth the lost tax revenue and giving up the kickback$ from big tobacco and the pharmaceutical$.
Hopefully they will make a logical and fair decision, but that seems to be a rare occurrence nowadays.

I couldn't respectfully disagree more, I've dealt with politicians and the likes they don't want to ban this "boom" of a new industry, they want to regulate it! Not for minors or for our safety... they want the big bucks that come with the hefty taxes it'll impose. They'll have their little trials and such in the end they'll make it seem like they put up a fight and it'll be legal but REGULATED! Taxes won't be too bad to start but soon will rise and rise, then states will take those taxes to new highs and you'll wonder if this is really cheaper than smoking. Of course at least it's better for your health.
 

finagle69

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 11, 2013
1,027
1,311
47
Sacramento, CA
I couldn't respectfully disagree more, I've dealt with politicians and the likes they don't want to ban this "boom" of a new industry, they want to regulate it! Not for minors or for our safety... they want the big bucks that come with the hefty taxes it'll impose. They'll have their little trials and such in the end they'll make it seem like they put up a fight and it'll be legal but REGULATED! Taxes won't be too bad to start but soon will rise and rise, then states will take those taxes to new highs and you'll wonder if this is really cheaper than smoking. Of course at least it's better for your health.

That's the way I see it going down. Why ban it when you can make millions from taxes off of it? Aren't some BT companies already invested/ing in some vaping properties?
 

Jeremy Evans

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 19, 2013
1,012
1,143
Columbus, Georgia, United States
That's the way I see it going down. Why ban it when you can make millions from taxes off of it? Aren't some BT companies already invested/ing in some vaping properties?

If that is the case then why not legalize other substances that have been shown to be beneficial to people who are battling cancer and can only eat and manage the pain they have with the substance I am speaking of. Answer in short is that it would take away from pharmaceutical companies who contribute greatly to the FDA
 

finagle69

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 11, 2013
1,027
1,311
47
Sacramento, CA
If that is the case then why not legalize other substances that have been shown to be beneficial to people who are battling cancer and can only eat and manage the pain they have with the substance I am speaking of. Answer in short is that it would take away from pharmaceutical companies who contribute greatly to the FDA
But of course! Thus the huge ironic joke of it all...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread