Frustrated

Status
Not open for further replies.

HeyYouComOvrHere

Full Member
Verified Member
Aug 24, 2009
66
2
56
Maryland
I'll tell you what frustrates me the MOST about this entire e-Smoking discussion, my health. We are talking about MY HEATH here...not yours. You are telling me I can buy something that has been PROVEN to kill people but I cannot buy an alternative that has been proven to NOT have ALL of those chemicals that ARE killing people. Granted, we may not know the long term impact of vaping, but I can go anywhere, buy cigarettes and smoke them virtually anywhere outside or in my house. So, why can't I be given the same opportunity with an alternative. Patches and gum are NOT the same alternative.

I'm not going to say it is safe...but common sense tells me it has to be safER than regular cigarettes....right? I also understand the reasons the FDA wants full blown impact studies done on e-smoking. But why are you going to insist I continue to kill myself in the meantime? Why can't it be buyer-beware until the studies are completed? This is ridiculous. I don't want to have to start hoarding supplies as if I am building a bomb shelter waiting for a nuclear attack. This is just plain ludicrous. I am all for Government oversight and I agree we have to have SOME governance but banning the products and refusing me the opportunity to live a healthier life? Even if there are no studies telling me it is SAFIER, I can tell you what I DO know....since I started vaping....

1. I can taste foods I was not able to taste
2. I haven't had to clean my house as often
3. My girlfriend enjoys kissing me more (Not sure what that REALLY says BUT...lol)
4. My clothes don't need the dry cleaners as often and in turn saves me money.
5. I can go up and down steps without huffing and puffing.
6. Family and friends ENJOY riding in my car now because they can BREATH and SEE out my windows.
7. When I drop my e-cig while driving, I don't scramble to find it before it catches car on fire and I drive off the road.

I can go on and on but the MOST important thing I CAN say about ME since switching to vaping...

As an asthmatic who constantly has sore throats, gets bronchitis several times a year and always has clogged sinuses, for the past two months I have not had ONE sore throat, not ONE bout with bronchitis, my constant nasal drip seems to have stopped, and I have not burned my clothes, car seats or fingers. It seems to me, those things ALONE make the e-cigs safer than real cigarettes. Forget all the testing of the products and materials WITHIN the e-cig that I cannot see, skip the tangibles and ask me about my OVERALL health and the safety of those around me since switching to vaping. PLEASE, ask me Mr. FDA.

Don't kill me or turn me back into an involuntary murderer...we're really not into genecide...
 

HeyYouComOvrHere

Full Member
Verified Member
Aug 24, 2009
66
2
56
Maryland
Yes, that now 11 month 85 lb black lab is mine. He likes vaping too....well, at least he likes getting in my juice bottles...lol. He got in a 5ml bottle of butterscotch one day and I FREAKED!!!! Wanna see a dog get sick quick, pour 1/4 cup of peroxide down his throat...he won't have that stuff in his stomach long...lol. He gets into EVERYTHING. Right now, I am fighting the Keep-a-way game. Oh the joys of puppy ownership.
 

HeyYouComOvrHere

Full Member
Verified Member
Aug 24, 2009
66
2
56
Maryland
I emailed that post to "Letters" section of my local newspaper, The Washington Post. Hopefully, someone will decide to publish it or at least start a dialog for OUR side...Feel free to plagiarise it and send it to your own paper. Would be quite funny to have the same story show up as an editorial in all the major papers around the country...if not the world...lol.
 

HeyYouComOvrHere

Full Member
Verified Member
Aug 24, 2009
66
2
56
Maryland
I just had a follow on thought to my original post...

How is it a company or person can use "Patent Pending" or "Trademark" and receive the same protections that come with "Patent No. XYZ" and "Registered" but we are not allowed to continue using the product that is helping change our lives for the GOOD while all this mess gets resolved?

Think about it, if I come up with a catchy little logo for my company, I can LEGALLY put the "TM" after it and violla, it is Trademarked while I am submitting the appropriate paperwork allowing me to put the circled "R" after the same logo...why can't the FDA afford e-Smokers the SAME EXACT opportunity?

You know, when I get my medications at the pharmacy, I have to sign a document saying the pharmacist has counseled me about the effects of the medicine I just got...this releases the pharmacist of any legal ramifications of me doing something wrong with the medicine. Why can't we use the same procedure when buying products from suppliers? This just doesn't seem to be too difficult resolve. Sure, the final decision of what to do about e-Smoking still needs to be resolved but don't let those who are trying to make a better, safer, healthier life for themselves (regardless of what a doctor may say, I KNOW I feel better and healthier) be punished and forced to either go through what could be nasty (and dangerous for some) withdrawals or even worse, resort back to smoking.

Damn, it just seems like the solutions are pretty straight forward...maybe I am not intelligent enough to understand the full magnatude of what it would take to make it work...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread