Well, the battery and atomizer managed to survive. I dried them out and used a new cart (tossed the old one out)
After vaping the one that took a toilet bath, I can say for sure that it now tastes like a real cigarette.
Get a load of this BS
- Thread starter BigJimW
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Well, the battery and atomizer managed to survive. I dried them out and used a new cart (tossed the old one out)
After vaping the one that took a toilet bath, I can say for sure that it now tastes like a real cigarette.
you've found the missing linkWell, the battery and atomizer managed to survive. I dried them out and used a new cart (tossed the old one out)
After vaping the one that took a toilet bath, I can say for sure that it now tastes like a real cigarette.
how do you change your statusAnd, I can't post a poll.
I tossed the admins here a couple of bucks each month as a supporter. You get a few "perks", like changing your custom title. Almost like being a Washington politician.
I sent the guy an email correcting his (many) errors. If he bothers to reply I'll post it.
The PG paranoia is really starting to get on my nerves.
I believe it was used in food products before it was used in antifreeze. Antifreeze originally used ethylene glycol, which is toxic to the point of being potentially fatal upon ingestion. Then they realized that this low-toxicity food additive called Propylene glycol actually works better! Sounds scary to me
I believe it was used in food products before it was used in antifreeze. Antifreeze originally used ethylene glycol, which is toxic to the point of being potentially fatal upon ingestion. Then they realized that this low-toxicity food additive called Propylene glycol actually works better! Sounds scary to me
Last edited:
Though obviously a typo, the "liquid nitrogen" line was a hoot. 
I'm more concerned though about the apparently intentional blurring of the distinction between propylene and ethylene glycol. I've seen this tactic before from other anti-(fill-in-the-blank) groups.
Of course, we are talking about a bunch of lawyers shopping for their next BMW--er, I mean their next client.
TT33
I'm more concerned though about the apparently intentional blurring of the distinction between propylene and ethylene glycol. I've seen this tactic before from other anti-(fill-in-the-blank) groups.
Of course, we are talking about a bunch of lawyers shopping for their next BMW--er, I mean their next client.
TT33
Should we be posting comments on the blog? If we all voice our disagreement in a respectable, scientific manner it couldn't hurt... right?
OMG, just like those dastardly e-juice manufacturers are adding flavors! Everybody knows that only children like colors and flavor.
Though obviously a typo, the "liquid nitrogen" line was a hoot.
That "typo" was no typo, I can assure you. It was intentional. It's a "shock factor" to get as many people suckered into this bullsh*t class action "suit" as possible. Lawyers do that.
Q) What's 12 inches long and hangs in front of an as*hole?
A) A laywers tie!
Upon further thought, and considering the source of the "typo", you're right. That was intentional, too.
"The trouble with the legal profession is that 98% of its members give the rest a bad name."
TT33
I am usually the quiet observer in this forum, but this guy tipped me over the edge. So here it goes... The author, John Bernard Dawson...
He is probably an ambulance chasing attorney who does not have enough legal experience (3 years) and skills to go after the big boys (cigarette companies).
Among other idiotic statements he made, he also states that there is NO evidence that inhalation of PG is safe... bla bla bla... Well, check this reasoning out..., there are enough scientific evidence that inhalation of analog cigarette over a prolonged period of time is proven UNSAFE.
Class action my behind... even with the SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE he can't win... How is he gonna go after e-cig companies with NO evidence.
If he is so concerned about public health, he should go after 40k identified hazardous chemical compound containing product.
Incompetent idiots like him makes me want to smoke more... Oh, but I (20 yrs ex-smoker) don't smoke anymore ... I vape!
I almost feel sorry for him... NOT!
He is probably an ambulance chasing attorney who does not have enough legal experience (3 years) and skills to go after the big boys (cigarette companies).
Among other idiotic statements he made, he also states that there is NO evidence that inhalation of PG is safe... bla bla bla... Well, check this reasoning out..., there are enough scientific evidence that inhalation of analog cigarette over a prolonged period of time is proven UNSAFE.
Class action my behind... even with the SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE he can't win... How is he gonna go after e-cig companies with NO evidence.
If he is so concerned about public health, he should go after 40k identified hazardous chemical compound containing product.
Incompetent idiots like him makes me want to smoke more
... Oh, but I (20 yrs ex-smoker) don't smoke anymore ... I vape! I almost feel sorry for him... NOT
!
I don't think "nitrogen" was a typo either Jim. I think it was a scare-mongoring tactic to weasle unknowing clients in. ...arrrrg!
I think we should overload the comments section or send personal emails. (Click on his name at the top.)
I will definitely post any reply I get from him.
I think we should overload the comments section or send personal emails. (Click on his name at the top.)
I will definitely post any reply I get from him.
well, try to email him, but submit button didn't work.
Well maybe he can read it here.
"Well, been using ecigarettes for about 3 months. I've turned green from inhaling the antifreeze and my body is so cold from inhaling the liquid nitrogen. I wash in LP to warm my body back up.
We could use a good man like you on the planet zion."
Well maybe he can read it here.
"Well, been using ecigarettes for about 3 months. I've turned green from inhaling the antifreeze and my body is so cold from inhaling the liquid nitrogen. I wash in LP to warm my body back up.
We could use a good man like you on the planet zion."
Last edited:
Let's ask him if he want to represent e-cig communities against FDA for banning e-cig. He will get lot more people to join the class action. That is if he is good enough to challenge the BIG BOYs
My comment. Let them read that.
I feel some dumb blond will read this tomorrow morning and be totally confused.
Last edited:
It's not a typo. We NEED the antifreeze to counteract the effects of the liquid nitrogen.
Kinda like having a Snickers bar with a Diet Coke -- they cancel each other out.
Kinda like having a Snickers bar with a Diet Coke -- they cancel each other out.
True, but it's liquid oxygen and hydrogen. Now THAT would be a powerful throat hit!
I wonder who he intends to sue, though. Not the Chinese manufacturers, surely.
TT33
- Status
Similar threads
