Get Ready for Gruesome Cigarette Warnings (cigarette news)

Status
Not open for further replies.

kalojado

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 2, 2009
542
17
Dayton, Ohio Area
Copied and pasted from MSN, thought some of you would like to read this...

Graphic images of diseased body parts could become the norm on packaging.

By Jennifer Thomas, HealthDay Reporter


THURSDAY, Aug. 27 (HealthDay News) - Would a gruesome picture of a cancer-ravaged mouth with rotting teeth make you think twice about buying a pack of cigarettes?

That's the goal of new federal regulations expected to go into effect within three years. The rules will require tobacco companies to cover at least half of the front and back of packages with graphic—and possibly gruesome—images illustrating the dangers of smoking.

If U.S. regulations are modeled after those already in place in Canada and other countries, the warnings will be shocking: blackened lungs, gangrenous feet, bleeding brains and people breathing through tracheotomies.

Though hard to look at, the more graphic the image, the more effective in discouraging smoking, said Stanton Glantz, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco and director of the university's Center for tobacco Control, Research and Education.

"The graphic warnings really work," Glantz said. "They substantially increase the likelihood someone will quit smoking. They substantially decrease the chances a kid will smoke. And they really screw up the ability of the tobacco industry to use the packaging as a marketing tool."

Over the last decade, countries as varied as Canada, Australia, Chile, Brazil, Iran and Singapore, among others, have adopted graphic warnings on tobacco products. Some are downright disturbing: in Brazil, cigarette packages come with pictures of dead babies and a gangrened foot with blackened toes.


In the United States, the authority to force packaging changes was granted on June 22, when President Barack Obama, who has struggled with cigarette addiction since he was a teen, signed into law the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. The landmark legislation gives the U.S. Food and Drug Administration broad new authority to regulate the marketing of tobacco products.


Under the law, the FDA has two years to issue specifics about the new graphic warnings tobacco products will be required to carry. Tobacco companies then have 18 months to get them onto packages.


Currently, the United States has some of the weakest requirements for cigarette package warnings in the world, said David Hammond, an assistant professor in the department of health studies at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada. The text-only warnings on packages have changed little since 1984.


"Consumers in many Third World countries are getting more and better information about the risks of cigarettes off their packs," Hammond said.
With much at stake for tobacco companies, there will be much wrangling over the details, Glantz said.


Yet research shows the FDA shouldn't compromise, Glantz said. The more frightening the image, the greater the anti-smoking effect, he said.
Despite some research that has suggested images that are too stomach-turning may backfire because people eventually ignore them, new research is showing the most graphic images pack the most punch, said Jeremy Kees, an assistant professor of marketing at Villanova University.


In a yet-to-be published study, Kees had 541 adult smokers in the United States and Canada view a mild image of a smoker's mouth with yellowed teeth; a moderately graphic image of a diseased mouth; and a third photo of a grotesque, disfigured mouth.


The most disturbing photo evoked the most fear, prompting more smokers to say they intended to quit, Kees said.


While the new regulations may also include no-nonsense, text warnings such as "Smoking Makes You Impotent" and "Smoking Kills," the images will have the broadest reach, Hammond said.


Non-English speakers can understand the picture of a diseased mouth, as can people who are illiterate. Smokers tend to have lower literacy levels, Hammond noted.


And kids will get the message too, potentially stopping them from ever lighting up. "You have 4-year-olds and 5-year-olds who can understand that picture," Hammond said.


Elsewhere, graphic warnings seem to be helping to drive down smoking rates. In Canada, about 13 percent of the population smokes daily, a 5 percent drop since the graphic warnings were adopted in 2000, Hammond said.


About 21 percent of the U.S. population smokes daily, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


While powerful, the gruesome warnings won't get everyone to quit.
"Nicotine is highly addictive," Hammond said. "Health warnings are not a magic bullet, but they help move people closer to quitting and provide a constant reminder of why many people want to change."


The Tobacco Labelling Resource Centre has images of cigarette packages from around the world.
 

Moonflame

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 27, 2009
1,337
119
Smith Mt Lake area, Va, USA
Like those who smoke don't know the possible effects. In fact most of them can't because there has yet to be an "approved" method by doctors or pharma that actually works. I think the only real effect would be an increase in the sales of cigarette cases :). If they think it will dissuade teens they don't know teens. My son is 18 and has been fascinated with gruesome video games, movies, CD covers, etc for years. He bought his girlfriend a shark in a jar of formaldehyde when he went to the beach and she thought it was the coolest gift in the world. Her exact words, "who wants flowers or candy when you can have a preserved shark in a jar, I'm glad he knows me so well."
 

Misty

Forum Admin Supplier & Commercial Manager
Admin
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 16, 2008
40,836
1,401
Canada
In Canada, we've had these gruesome diseased images on almost 50% of the front of the pack..at first it had been embarrassing to purchase but as usual..we got habituated to the image within a few months..and it had no effect in deterring further purchase.
THen Canada implemented hiding all cigs on shelves recently..trying to be more effective in deterring sales.
 

Fredrick

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 27, 2009
119
1
South Florida (Broward County)
Have they not noticed that horror movies are a huge franchise? Some people love gore. At the least, it will boost sales of designer cigarette cases. I'm not trying to say it will not have any of the effect they are looking for, but I've already been watching blackened lungs on TV commercials for years now, and it didn't keep me from buying/smoking cigarettes. People need good alternatives to smoking TODAY, not a look into what COULD happen to them in the future. Just my two bits.
 

OutWest

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 8, 2009
1,195
1
Oklahoma USA
www.alternasmokes.com
The images might deter some from starting, but I sincerely doubt that it will actually cause people to quit. For one, many simply dont have the ability to quit. Others simply dont want to. And, after a bit you tend to get desensitized to shocking images such as those used by some countries on cig packages. A perfect example of becoming desensitized is the infamous goatse pics on the web. At first it's shocking and then it becomes mundane and boring.

If they really want to curb sales, they need to restrict sales of cigs to places that sell hard liquor and porn, and get cigs out of the grocery stores and gas stations. And they need to take other steps to slow down the underage sales (in some states approx. 20% of retailers were recently found to be selling cigs to minors).

The reality is, they dont want people to quit smoking and they want more to start. Theyre too dependent on the tax revenue. Theyre only doing things such as the graphic images in order to make it appear that theyre trying to get people to quit. It's all smoke and mirrors.
 

Rogue X2 v2

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Apr 27, 2009
240
2
Like those who smoke don't know the possible effects. In fact most of them can't because there has yet to be an "approved" method by doctors or pharma that actually works. I think the only real effect would be an increase in the sales of cigarette cases :). If they think it will dissuade teens they don't know teens. My son is 18 and has been fascinated with gruesome video games, movies, CD covers, etc for years. He bought his girlfriend a shark in a jar of formaldehyde when he went to the beach and she thought it was the coolest gift in the world. Her exact words, "who wants flowers or candy when you can have a preserved shark in a jar, I'm glad he knows me so well."

how big was the shark? :w00t:
 

Vapor Pete

The Vapor Pope
ECF Veteran
Mar 14, 2009
2,847
2,134
Rochester, NY
Good. Put the pictures on the packs of smokes. Just stop putting them on national TV at dinner time for my 4 year old to look at while she eats. Maybe the government, in their infinate wisdom, can help me explain the nauseating images to my children who know nothing of smoking or its dangers.

So, lower the nic in cigarettes so smokers smoke more in an effort to reduce smoking, and put graphic and disturbing images on packs in an effort to reduce smoking... but BAN a product that has reduced smoking with no explicit imagry or gov. control.... does anyone else see the idiocy in that?

ps: Lets not forget that putting photos on packs will cost more money... so expect another tax increase on cigarettes.
Lower nic = smokers buying more cigarettes
More cigarettes purchased = more revenue
More revenue = more money to pay for anti-smoking propaganda

Ah. Now I get it.:rolleyes:

My best,
-VP
 

arembee

Full Member
ECF Veteran
May 21, 2009
24
0
Central Texas, USA
Copied and pasted from MSN, thought some of you would like to read this...

Graphic images of diseased body parts could become the norm on packaging.

By Jennifer Thomas, HealthDay Reporter

The most disturbing photo evoked the most fear, prompting more smokers to say they intended to quit, Kees said.

The Tobacco Labelling Resource Centre has images of cigarette packages from around the world.

Intended to quit? Easier said than done.
 

surich

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 18, 2009
96
0
Houston, TX
Smokers tend to have lower literacy levels, Hammond noted.

EXCUSE ME?? Since when? As someone who tested out at COLLEGE LEVEL literacy by the time I was in the 6th grade, I find that statement EXTREMELY offensive!

Show your pictures if you want, I agree we need to quit, but such a sweeping statement is just... ARGGG! :mad:

Sorry, had to get that off my chest!
 

drdave

Full Member
Jul 10, 2009
17
1
First, I went to e-smokes to reduce the risk, not to quit. If the FDA sucessfully manages to kill the devices, do they think scary images are gonna keep me away from smoking? I just hope they rotate the photos like they do now with the sugeron general's warning. Teens will love this even more "gotta collect em all!" If black lungs and rotten toe photos become commonplace on cigarette packs, I will just buy a matching t-shirt. On the front will be the grusome photo, on the back a message. The message would read...."government sponsored image, if this offends write your congressman or senator.":thumbs:
 

Fredrick

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 27, 2009
119
1
South Florida (Broward County)
First, I went to e-smokes to reduce the risk, not to quit. If the FDA sucessfully manages to kill the devices, do they think scary images are gonna keep me away from smoking? I just hope they rotate the photos like they do now with the sugeron general's warning. Teens will love this even more "gotta collect em all!" If black lungs and rotten toe photos become commonplace on cigarette packs, I will just buy a matching t-shirt. On the front will be the grusome photo, on the back a message. The message would read...."government sponsored image, if this offends write your congressman or senator.":thumbs:


I like that shirt idea.
 

Moonflame

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 27, 2009
1,337
119
Smith Mt Lake area, Va, USA
Remember when they said making the surgeon general's warning being bigger and covering more of the package would make smokers quit? That worked so well didn't it. Do they really think smokers don't know what the results of smoking can be? Has anyone else seen the movie Clerks...it reminds me of the "Cancer Merchant" scene.
 

Vicks Vap-oh-Yeah

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Mar 9, 2009
3,944
46
West Allis, WI
www.emeraldvapers.com
More symbolism over substance..... they have to 'show' the people they're doing something, while they're doing nothing to address the problem, or going in an opposite direction to the one they're appearing to go.

But, how much you wanna bet the anti's and the uninformed will CHEER the Gov't on for their 'continued battle' against the evils of tobacco?
 

Bandit

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 17, 2009
1,319
25
In your bushes, watching you undress
Oh no... whatever shall smokers do???

UserImg%5CMember_44586.jpg



louis_vuitton_cigarette_case.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread