GG no TS

[twilab]

Hi Imeo,

I just wondering if you thought of a bit different solution then TS to accomodate different types of batteries. Do you think that device like on picture could do the same? This will give at least no possible mistake with overtighten. May be I do not see something, but it also may act as small mode for 16340 with only bottom part as we discussed.

 

[RippleInStillWater]

I sort of like the telescoping thing........

 

[imeothanasis]

So you are talking about the very old GGT model twilab that had 3 sleeves so it could be transformed to nano, grant and giant?

 

[RippleInStillWater]

So you are talking about the very old GGT model twilab that had 3 sleeves so it could be transformed to nano, grant and giant?

That is the first time I have heard of the GG Giant!!!! But I should have recognized the pseudo-grant......

 

[imeothanasis]

Those were the between names of the GGT Ripple

 

[Wylie]

I prefer the telescope. I don't have to walk around with a bunch of parts in case I want to change batteries (which I do often).

 

[twilab]

I prefer the telescope. I don't have to walk around with a bunch of parts in case I want to change batteries (which I do often).

Don't see any difference in number of parts to carry if you need different versions on the go.

Imeo, if that was at the beginning, what was the reason to change to TS? What is the benefits?

 

[atavanhalen]

Don't see any difference in number of parts to carry if you need different versions on the go.

Imeo, if that was at the beginning, what was the reason to change to TS? What is the benefits?

The benefit in my eyes is that you do not need to remove anything to change batteries, you just twist the telescope to be larger or smaller. . You can have the small version(one 16340 or 1/18350 without using a the top portion of the ggts already. Sorry if this does not pertain to what you are talking about, it might be the language barrier.

 

[twilab]

The benefit in my eyes is that you do not need to remove anything to change batteries, you just twist the telescope to be larger or smaller. . You can have the small version(one 16340 or 1/18350 without using a the top portion of the ggts already. Sorry if this does not pertain to what you are talking about, it might be the language barrier.

Honestly speaking I do not see any difference between this two variants from usability point of view.

TS gave some additional flexibility in size, but honestly speaking what else except 16340/18350 (bottom part); 14500, 17500, 18500 (bottom+middle part) and 2*16340, 18650, 18670 (all 3 parts) can you use? Personally I would be happy even with 2 part device (no need for me for 50mm batteries)

 

[imeothanasis]

Exactly twilab. First I made the Grant (2xcr2 batteries or 1x14500). Then I made the nano (1x16340). Then the super nano (1xcr2). Then I deside to find a way to fit all of those GG to one unit so I made the GGT. Then I thought to get rid of the sections so I made the telescope. Also the telescope can take all the small or big differences that batteries have, it can take future batteries too and it doesnt need spring to work

Don't see any difference in number of parts to carry if you need different versions on the go.

Imeo, if that was at the beginning, what was the reason to change to TS? What is the benefits?

 

[twilab]

Then I deside to find a way to fit all of those GG to one unit so I made the GGT.

I think I want GGT then -) Do you plan to get back to this version some time?

But 16340 small SS unit and UFSS (Small) will be great as well. I have enough big ones already -))

 

[imeothanasis]

I dont think so twilab my friend. Its an old thought and its already copied many times. Many mods have sections now so no reason to make this again. Telescope serves everything we want in the best way if you agree. Carrying sections is not something that I would like.

 

[inquisitorj]

You could try putting up a want to buy in the classifieds. You never know what older style mod people may be willing to part with.

 

[mefistophel]

Exactly twilab. First I made the Grant (2xcr2 batteries or 1x14500). Then I made the nano (1x16340). Then the super nano (1xcr2).

I saw these videos

 

[imeothanasis]

These are the correct videos mefi

 

[Harley]

Hi Imeo,

I just wondering if you thought of a bit different solution then TS to accomodate different types of batteries. Do you think that device like on picture could do the same? This will give at least no possible mistake with overtighten. May be I do not see something, but it also may act as small mode for 16340 with only bottom part as we discussed.

View attachment 40719

That would be a GGT or a GG Transformer............ That has already been made, And is a great MOD..... I have a broken one that i can't get parts for.....

 

[imeothanasis]

Ok guys, I thought of something very special this time. Your thoughts gave me some food lol. Thanks to all of you

 

[twilab]

Don't feed Imeo or we all will starve soon

 

[imeothanasis]

Twi, you made the wrong choice to open this thread but its too late now

 

[twilab]

I know that I'll pay for this, but I have another question

In UFS now CT and LT are connected when fully assembled. Do you think that it might be possible to make liquid control as a part of atom adapter. So you can disasable CT and LT without empting LT. Actually this is also allow to have adapter for 901, without liquid control, but in same UFS.

Also Adapter for 901 probably may regulate liquid almost same way, but closing side hole. I'll try to draw simple picture. Tank capacity will be reduced a bit in this case of cause.

And even more questions. Do you think that height of CT may be a bit reduced? Anyway it can work only with small amount of liquid in it ~ 0,5ml, but can hold about 2 I gess.