We do not restrict links to all other e-cig forums. However, there are some sites (not just forums) that we prefer not to link to as a matter of how and who forum ownership wants to be associated with/ represented by.
Greensmoke bans flavors in California
- Thread starter IceMaiden101
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
We do not restrict links to all other e-cig forums. However, there are some sites (not just forums) that we prefer not to link to as a matter of how and who forum ownership wants to be associated with/ represented by.
It's interesting how things come about. Thanks for enlightening me more on the subject. Many have believed that politicians out to ban e-cigs altogether were the ultimate adversaries. However, I am coming to think that the best way for them to win is quite possibly to do exactly what they are doing in CA... start clipping the branches off the tree until there is nothing left but a stump. And when you think about it, who will be to blame technically? Its the companies that are making the decisions to do as "asked".
*And I guess it probably falls on all us to a certain extent as well. No one else can better take up the cause than we the actual vapers regarding this subject.
Last edited:
I'll never understand this ban stuff while cigarettes (known potential killers and illness causers) are allowed to stay. Without getting deeper that makes ZERO sense to me. This helped me quit and I enjoy it dammit.
Anyway, I have been a GreenSmoker since last May and I think they are eliminating flavors altogether, other than menthol and tobacco...never been a tobacco person. Their menthol is good, but even their flavors that had recently been "improved" burn out on me way too fast so I have decided to switch to an E-Go because of those reasons.
Anyway, I have been a GreenSmoker since last May and I think they are eliminating flavors altogether, other than menthol and tobacco...never been a tobacco person. Their menthol is good, but even their flavors that had recently been "improved" burn out on me way too fast so I have decided to switch to an E-Go because of those reasons.
if your kid has $150 for a greensmoke kit and somehow orders,uses and maintains it without your knowledge, you may want to rexamine your parenting skills.
a coworker of mine said they have a whole new flavor line, that sucks compared to the originals
I have not read the whole thread but my guess, correct me if wrong, is that the ban / restriction to flavor is related to the traditional only-two-or-three classic flavours of medical products, with an extended hermeneutic criteria as to keep kids away from PVs, etc. Well, but then again, maybe; if this or similar is the case, you could use as an argument the fact that e-cigs will only work as a terapheutic approach or alternative to smoking if you can swap more than the basic flavors. Which is only true and very easy to demonstrate: Many of us only find our 'sweet' spot with exotic flavors and most of us are affected by the periods in which flavors dont appear so changes are neccesary.....
So, couldnt this reason be of a legal argumental basis?
So, couldnt this reason be of a legal argumental basis?
They can ban flavors all they want, won't stop me from adding in my own favorite flavors at all. Of course I do DIY anyway.
This has got to change. They go and ban flavored liquid for the PVs but continue to allow flavored liquor, malts and beers? Wouldn't an apple flavored malt beverage be just as enticing as apple flavored ejuice?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
