H.R.2058 - FDA Deeming Authority Clarification Act of 2015
- Thread starter Bronze
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Nibbles. The Bishop-Cole amendment is bipartisan in name only.
Here's the vote--posted earlier by Kent C:
Republicans
- Harold Rogers, Kentucky, Chairman - aye
- Rodney P. Frelinghuysen, New Jersey - aye
- Robert B. Aderholt, Alabama - aye
- Kay Granger, Texas - aye
- Michael K. Simpson, Idaho - aye
- John Abney Culberson, Texas - aye
- Ander Crenshaw, Florida - aye
- John R. Carter, Texas - aye
- Ken Calvert, California - aye
- Tom Cole, Oklahoma - aye
- Mario Diaz-Balart, Florida - aye
- Charles W. Dent, Pennsylvania - no
- Tom Graves, Georgia - aye
- Kevin Yoder, Kansas - aye
- Steve Womack, Arkansas - aye
- Jeff Fortenberry, Nebraska - aye
- Tom Rooney, Florida - aye
- Chuck Fleischmann, Tennessee - aye
- Jaime Herrera Beutler, Washington - aye
- David Joyce, Ohio - aye
- David Valadao, California - aye
- Andy Harris, MD, Maryland - aye
- Martha Roby, Alabama - aye
- Mark Amodei, Nevada - aye
- Chris Stewart, Utah - aye
- Scott Rigell, Virginia - aye
- David Jolly, Florida - aye
- David Young, Iowa - aye
- Evan Jenkins, West Virginia - aye
- Steven Palazzo, Mississippi - aye
- Nita M. Lowey, New York -no
- Marcy Kaptur, Ohio -no
- Peter J. Visclosky, Indiana -no
- José E. Serrano, New York -no
- Rosa L. DeLauro, Connecticut -no
- David E. Price, North Carolina -no
- Lucille Roybal-Allard, California -no
- Sam Farr, California -no
- Chaka Fattah, Pennsylvania - na
- Sanford D. Bishop, Jr., Georgia - aye
- Barbara Lee, California -no
- Michael M. Honda, California -no
- Betty McCollum, Minnesota -no
- Steve Israel, New York -no
- Tim Ryan, Ohio -no
- C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, Maryland -no
- Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Florida -no
- Henry Cuellar, Texas - aye
- Chellie Pingree, Maine -no
- Mike Quigley, Illinois -no
- Derek Kilmer, Washington -no
Dems,
New York 3
Cal. - 4
7 of the 19 Nay's from 2 of the Most Anti-vaping State governments in the Country
Go Figure
New York 3
Cal. - 4
7 of the 19 Nay's from 2 of the Most Anti-vaping State governments in the Country
Go Figure
Last edited:
Dems,
New York 3
Cal. - 4
7 of the 19 Nay's from 2 of the Most Anti-Naping State governments in the Country
Go Figure
I've been working on my reps staff relentless, forget cali, there in dept up to there knee's with MSA, you have your work cut out ..........
C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, Maryland -no 
Not in my district
Andy Harris, MD, Maryland - aye Not in my district
John Delaney(D) Maryland District 6, My District........useless
Every attempt has fallen of deaf ears with his political group of croney's
While I support our Veterans........this has been his ONLY Focus the last 6 months. You would think it was an election year............
Not in my districtAndy Harris, MD, Maryland - aye
Not in my district John Delaney(D) Maryland District 6, My District........useless
Every attempt has fallen of deaf ears with his political group of croney's
While I support our Veterans........this has been his ONLY Focus the last 6 months. You would think it was an election year............
The Ag appropriations bill (mark up) second meeting starts at 10:30, EST today.
I'm going to try to listen. But, I'm not sure I want to be the one to report back on it.
That didn't turn out well for me last time. I'm not a good seck-a-terry.
here is the link if anyone else wants to listen...(Tues, the meeting started about 35 minutes late, so if the audio doesn't play right away, it could mean the meeting hasn't started.)
Markup of the FY17 Agriculture Appropriations Bill and the FY17 Legislative Branch Appropriations Bill | United States Senate Committee on Appropriations
I'm going to try to listen. But, I'm not sure I want to be the one to report back on it.
That didn't turn out well for me last time. I'm not a good seck-a-terry.
here is the link if anyone else wants to listen...(Tues, the meeting started about 35 minutes late, so if the audio doesn't play right away, it could mean the meeting hasn't started.)
Markup of the FY17 Agriculture Appropriations Bill and the FY17 Legislative Branch Appropriations Bill | United States Senate Committee on Appropriations
Listened to the entire webcast in the background. No mention of Cole-Bishop. I'm not sure how the process works at this level of detail but I'm not sure at what point there could be an amendment to previously passed amendments. The only things talked about today was adding things to the bill and not changing anything that has already passed a vote.
That was my take too, and I agree, I don't know how the process works.
As a side note, I was happy with the vote regarding GM salmon, and the vote regarding the labeling of crab.
I wasn't actually following those issues, but I do feel that they're important, so I don't feel it was a total waste listening.
That was my take too, and I agree, I don't know how the process works.
As a side note, I was happy with the vote regarding GM salmon, and the vote regarding the labeling of crab.
Have to watch out for those pincers when applying labels
........
Spent many a day gathering Crabs from the Elizabeth River to sell in the neighborhood as a Child. Today the FDA would have me imprisoned for that.
Heard something about a meeting with the FDA on Friday for some Clarification. Not sure if Pharma, tobacco or Both( Smokefreeradio.org )
I guess I never took it as one or the other, between the two.
I'm for anything that might help us.
Ess u dew...em peenchers ull get ur finners!!Have to watch out for those pincers when applying labels
Spent many a day gathering Crabs from the Elizabeth River to sell in the neighborhood as a Child. Today the FDA would have me imprisoned for that.
Heard something about a meeting with the FDA on Friday for some Clarification. Not sure if Pharma, Tobacco or Both( Smokefreeradio.org )
Interesting, there's radio??
I really should get out more!!I haven't heard anything regarding Friday.
Me too. But as we have seen, there are some who want to abandon HR2058. Not me! I also want to push Cole-Bishop.
I completely agree, push them both. I don't understand why anyone would want to abandon either one...but, you know, everyone has an opinion...
HR2058 was "upgraded" and added to the Ag Appropriation bill. HR2058 is the basis for that amendment. It can be used as a basis for other amendments as well. And I never count out the possibility it can pass in both chambers and be signed by the president....not this president, but the next one. Never know! HR2058 has a big advantage over an amendment to an appropriation bill. HR2058 is a law. An amendment to an appropriation bill is only valid as long as the appropriation bill exists. In other words, it has to come up for approval every year...essentially.
Nothing more than reason to Support BOTH as previously mentioned.
Focus should remain on Pushing for MOST LIKELY to succeed. Right now, by all Poles, that is the Cole-Bishop version of the Previous Cole Bill attempt.
Not saying do not support H.R.2058 but rather Send (Double messages) on Approving Each on its own merit.
A Bill with no Explanation as to regulation does not offer much credibility in Committee.(No Bite) One Clear Reason the Cole-Bishop Bill became an Amendment in the Agricultural bill.(Reasonable regulation)
Lets not get people confused as to the Validity of Supporting not only Both Actions, but also the need to Support the one with the most likely chance to Succeed.
Time is what is needed for Legal experts to make their Challenges in a Court of Law.
Each time I contact (or try to contact) my reps, I make sure I mention BOTH and that I strongly urge support for both, should they come to their attention. I also strongly suggest that I AM watching how they vote on both of these, should the Bill and/or the Amendment come before them, and my vote will reflect on how they voted, when they come up for re-election.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
