Well I got to the end. I not convinced but not unconvinced either. What, if anyone knows, does this product put into one's body. Hopefully nanobeads are not just hi-tech tars. My suspicion would be that if the product gives the hit, the flavor and consistency - there is likely a way to mod it to add some vapor if that is ones desire. Seems like I've run across a double barrel mod in the past?
- Status
Hello! I have a few questions, if you don't mind. I would like to find out the following:
How is that device different from Nicotrol inhaler?
The feel and size of the REAL" NO Vapor" Filter provides the same sensation as if you were smoking a regular cigarette
How is that possible without vapor/smoke?
REAL Nanobead filters are manufactured in an ISO 9001 Certified Laboratory
Can you prove that? Produce a copy of a certificate?
Each Nanobead Filter contains 2 mg of Nicotine
In what form? Is there a carrier? Solvent? What goes into the cartridges? How is flavoring delivered? What kind of flavorings are they using? Can you list the ingredients?
Thank you.
How is that device different from Nicotrol inhaler?
The feel and size of the REAL" NO Vapor" Filter provides the same sensation as if you were smoking a regular cigarette
How is that possible without vapor/smoke?
REAL Nanobead filters are manufactured in an ISO 9001 Certified Laboratory
Can you prove that? Produce a copy of a certificate?
Each Nanobead Filter contains 2 mg of Nicotine
In what form? Is there a carrier? Solvent? What goes into the cartridges? How is flavoring delivered? What kind of flavorings are they using? Can you list the ingredients?
Thank you.
Last edited:
I've read over half the posts on this topic and I'm surprised it's been allowed to continue. There seem to have been far too many posts with a very heavy slant on promoting the company, the stock and the product - in that order.
Beyond that point, has anyone actually looked at the pricing? I could get by on about $18.00 of e-cig liquids per month. One of the selling points on that web site is this thing "only" costs the equivalent of $3.50 or $4.00 a pack...? Disputed health claims aside, why is anyone trying to sell raising my monthly costs to almost what I was spending on cigarettes to begin with as some kind of an advantage?
Coming here to promote this thing, you are preaching to the wrong choir.
I see an "As seen on TeeVee" commercial coming any day now...
Beyond that point, has anyone actually looked at the pricing? I could get by on about $18.00 of e-cig liquids per month. One of the selling points on that web site is this thing "only" costs the equivalent of $3.50 or $4.00 a pack...? Disputed health claims aside, why is anyone trying to sell raising my monthly costs to almost what I was spending on cigarettes to begin with as some kind of an advantage?
Coming here to promote this thing, you are preaching to the wrong choir.
I see an "As seen on TeeVee" commercial coming any day now...
well if you can't beat them then vaporize them....I tried but the best sensation is without fire....or heat or anything else that you desire.... and I'm just a big stock pumper......WTF do I know?
For anyone waiting for the market to open, here's some great reading: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...eresting-new-company-maybe-future-e-cigs.html
Wow. So you're talking about the schlock market, not the stock market? Right?
History do seem to repeat itself.Can we close this thread now? (Please...)
No Vapor?....No dice...LOL...what would be the point...kind a like the king that couldnt tell he didnt have any clothes on....LOL A fairy tale
..they'll be back
I don't know why people who play in penny stocks get so bent out of shape though - you never seen the sweet little old lady playing keno loose her cool.
I don't know why people who play in penny stocks get so bent out of shape though - you never seen the sweet little old lady playing keno loose her cool.
Interesting link NicLiq.
I suspected whacked, and yet I called Jtoo out on the merits, (which there were none).
He/she just got mad, and ran away, all proud of his 80k whatever (crook).
Love ECF for those who can call em out, and relatively fast.
I suspected whacked, and yet I called Jtoo out on the merits, (which there were none).
He/she just got mad, and ran away, all proud of his 80k whatever (crook).
Love ECF for those who can call em out, and relatively fast.
Last edited:
This is likely a repeat of a prior post. (Didn't care to re-read everything again.) But maybe not. Anyway, some discussion on the patent is here SMOKELESS CIGARETTE AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF - Patent application. An extract is here:
"[0019]The nano-bead solution (4) comprises nano-beads and/or organic substances such as sugars, amino-acids, to which nicotine can be attached, water and/or volatilisation accelerators and further substances named in the course of this paragraph. The nano-beads contained in it comprise mineral materials, preferably aluminium silicates or silicone oxides. The particle sizes vary between 5 nm and 5 [mu]M, preferably 10 nm-100 nm. The nano-particles and/or other organic substances such as sugars, amino-acids etc, interact with nicotine and aroma substances as a result of their large surface or their properties." My prior comment about "tars" may have so merit. I do think some more facts are needed. Also, just a first glance over on the reference - it seems as if ethanol may be the carrier.
"[0019]The nano-bead solution (4) comprises nano-beads and/or organic substances such as sugars, amino-acids, to which nicotine can be attached, water and/or volatilisation accelerators and further substances named in the course of this paragraph. The nano-beads contained in it comprise mineral materials, preferably aluminium silicates or silicone oxides. The particle sizes vary between 5 nm and 5 [mu]M, preferably 10 nm-100 nm. The nano-particles and/or other organic substances such as sugars, amino-acids etc, interact with nicotine and aroma substances as a result of their large surface or their properties." My prior comment about "tars" may have so merit. I do think some more facts are needed. Also, just a first glance over on the reference - it seems as if ethanol may be the carrier.
Another link that may relate to the "tars" of this smokeless cigarette: FDA urged to limit nanoparticle use in cosmetics and sunscreens
I think there is another question raised in this link. Is the alleged patent of "smokeless cigarette" product mentioned in this thread really meaningful. What seems to me as "unique" about the product is that the delivery media (i.e. the carrier) for the nicotine is nanobeads. But as best I can tell nanobeads might be created from a wide range of substances - including perhaps polyglycol. Wondering if there are any patent specialists out there that might hazard a guess as to whether the alleged patent is meaningful and defensible?
I think there is another question raised in this link. Is the alleged patent of "smokeless cigarette" product mentioned in this thread really meaningful. What seems to me as "unique" about the product is that the delivery media (i.e. the carrier) for the nicotine is nanobeads. But as best I can tell nanobeads might be created from a wide range of substances - including perhaps polyglycol. Wondering if there are any patent specialists out there that might hazard a guess as to whether the alleged patent is meaningful and defensible?
I think that it´s much more expensive than e-liquid, and i like lots of vapour, it´s not good for me i think
I reminds me of a stop smoking aid I tried several yrs ago. It was like the gum sort of. It was a plastic "cigarette" that everyone said looked like a tampon (lol) it had cylinder cartridges you put in it and inhailed it like a cig - no smoke - no vapor - it was weird and did not work for me. I am had to order them from the UK I believe - not sure on that but it was not in US.
Last edited:
We need Grimm Green on the case! Grimm, if you're out there, if you're listening, your open mind is needed. Please give the REAL a try and let the vaping world know what you think.
Can't.
Last I looked it wasn't even in stock.
Bet you can buy penny stocks on the market, however.
Succer born every minute, ring a bell?
Last I looked it wasn't even in stock.
Bet you can buy penny stocks on the market, however.
Succer born every minute, ring a bell?
There's also that whole issue of having to exist before it's reviewed.
What? All the stockholders here didn't order a kit when they were "released," or did they "sell out" too quick?
Maybe some would settle for a photograph of the RE/AL (NicStic/BelAir/Cobracres/Similar) in front of this thread.
What? All the stockholders here didn't order a kit when they were "released," or did they "sell out" too quick?
Maybe some would settle for a photograph of the RE/AL (NicStic/BelAir/Cobracres/Similar) in front of this thread.
I guess, (and haven't looked at it) the Huff Post ran some info on it and e-cigs in general.
Not favorable to e-cigs...you know, the whole antifreeze crap again, and how this model might be better?
Luckily a few from ECF jumped in and made point to clear up the myths.
As said however, I haven't read it.
Not favorable to e-cigs...you know, the whole antifreeze crap again, and how this model might be better?
Luckily a few from ECF jumped in and made point to clear up the myths.
As said however, I haven't read it.
You know what it reminds me of ? A few years back I tried to quit smoking with that stupid Nicotine inhaler RX. It was Worthless, no fun/vapor but good for planes. O and it tasted like ...... Plus it looks a tampon, and thats not a good look for anyone having a tampon hanging out your mouth.
- Status
Similar threads
